2002
DOI: 10.1111/j.1813-6982.2002.tb00055.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measures of Competitiveness: A Dynamic Approach to South Africa's Trade Performance in the 1990s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Adanya kompetisi perdagangan yang tinggi akan membuat setiap negara berupaya membuat strategi kebijakan yang tepat agar dapat bertahan hidup di tingkat persaingan yang semakin sulit (Hamdy, 2001 ................................................................................................ (1) Dimana: (Edwards & Schoer, 2002).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Adanya kompetisi perdagangan yang tinggi akan membuat setiap negara berupaya membuat strategi kebijakan yang tepat agar dapat bertahan hidup di tingkat persaingan yang semakin sulit (Hamdy, 2001 ................................................................................................ (1) Dimana: (Edwards & Schoer, 2002).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…(1) Analysis of competitiveness dynamics to assess the competitiveness performance of Indonesian coffee was done using Dynamic Revealed Comparative Advantage (DRCA) referring to Edwards & Schoer (2002). DRCA is able to describe RCA along with the development over time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Table 2 shows export position of a country in the international market. Edwards & Schoer (2002) According to Widodo (2010), positive value of Rank Spearman Correlation coefficient indicates competition between two countries in export market (both have similar comparative advantage pattern). Whereas, negative value means that the commodity is a complement in the product supply to export market (both have different comparative advantage pattern).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is supported by Hecksher (1919) and Ohlin (1933), who state that a country can gain a comparative advantage due to relative differences in physical capital. According to Edward and Schoer (2002), countries abundant in a given factor of production also have comparatively lower opportunity costs. In this regard Keesing (1966) states that human skills should also be considered as a factor of production factor, since countries relatively rich in this resource will have a comparative advantage in those products for which capital is used more intensively.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%