2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10940-016-9328-3
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Crime Concentration Across Cities of Varying Sizes: Complications Based on the Spatial and Temporal Scale Employed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a law would not guarantee, for example, that the most crime ridden 5% of the places contain any specific percent of crime, except that these places would have a lot more than 5%. This is consistent with Hipp and Kim (2016) who reported that 5% of street segments across 42 cities in southern California account for crime at its range from 35 to 100%. Our findings that calls for services are more concentrated than crime incidents, and that property crime is more concentrated than violent crime (for prevalence) suggest that researchers should be careful about drawing conclusions from data aggregating diverse sets of crimes and places.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Such a law would not guarantee, for example, that the most crime ridden 5% of the places contain any specific percent of crime, except that these places would have a lot more than 5%. This is consistent with Hipp and Kim (2016) who reported that 5% of street segments across 42 cities in southern California account for crime at its range from 35 to 100%. Our findings that calls for services are more concentrated than crime incidents, and that property crime is more concentrated than violent crime (for prevalence) suggest that researchers should be careful about drawing conclusions from data aggregating diverse sets of crimes and places.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This has led to the formulation of a law of crime concentration, which states that "for a defined measure of crime at a specific microgeographic unit, the concentration of crime will fall within a narrow bandwidth of percentages for a defined cumulative proportion of crime" (Weisburd 2015: 133). This proposition has since been the focus of several studies, and although a number of methodological concerns have been raised, the general proposition appears to hold true (Bernasco & Steenbeek 2017;Eck et al 2017;Levin et al 2017;Oliveira et al 2017;Haberman et al 2017;Gill et al 2017;Hipp & Kim 2017;Hibdon et al 2017).…”
Section: Geographically Targeted Policingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Also, some states have a small population which suffers chronic victimisation, meaning that they expect to suffer two or more crimes. These sorts of questions could also be answered using other data sources, for instance, the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) (Bureau of Justice Statistics 2016), the Crime Survey for England and Wales (Office for National Statistics 2017) or perhaps by examining crime calls at addresses or street segments (Hipp and Kim 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar type of metric is often used when the number of crimes suffered by the most victimised people is reported (Pease and Ignatans 2016;Pease 1998), or the most criminal individuals (Wolfgang et al 1987) or families (Farrington et al 2001). This metric, however, has some severe issues, such as the lack of agreement on the percentage that gets reported (Fox and Tracy 1988); the metric might not be comparable between different cities (Hipp and Kim 2016); it might be the result of a certain degree of randomness (Levin et al 2016) and it does not work as an adequate metric when the data is extremely sparse. Consider, for example, the number of street segments of The Hague and the number of sexual offences registered by the police between 2007 and 2009 in that city (Bernasco and Steenbeek 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%