2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1599867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Generalized Risk Orientation with a Single Survey Item

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While multi-item scales are ideal to measure risk orientation, when faced with limited space on national survey batteries, scholars note that this single-item measure can provide a reliable and valid assessment of an individual's proclivity for risk (Nadeau, Martin, and Blais 1999;Ehrlich and Maestas 2010;Maestas and Pollock 2010). In this study, we opted for a single-item measure due to survey space constraints.…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While multi-item scales are ideal to measure risk orientation, when faced with limited space on national survey batteries, scholars note that this single-item measure can provide a reliable and valid assessment of an individual's proclivity for risk (Nadeau, Martin, and Blais 1999;Ehrlich and Maestas 2010;Maestas and Pollock 2010). In this study, we opted for a single-item measure due to survey space constraints.…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that risk orientation will moderate one’s risk perception and in turn impact their welfare opinions. We measure risk orientation by asking respondents how comfortable (or uncomfortable) they are in taking risks when making financial, career or other life decisions denoted as risk orientation (Maestas and Pollock 2010). The variable uses a seven-point ordinal scale, where one end represents extreme risk acceptance and the opposite pole represents extreme risk aversion 6 .…”
Section: Data and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Please note that 1 indicates that you avoid taking any risks at all costs and 10 indicates that you engage in extremely risky and dangerous behaviors"). A single item rated on a Likert scale has been shown to be a valid and reliable way of assessing generalized risk orientation in different settings (Dohmen et al, 2011;Maestas & Pollock, 2010). …”
Section: Indices Of Risk-avoidancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we used a single-item measure of risk orientation that asks participants to rate their overall comfort with taking risks from extremely comfortable to extremely uncomfortable. 6 Second, we used the Risk Propensity Scale (RPS), a seven-item self-report measure of an individual's general propensity to take risks. 7 For the RPS, the summary score was calculated by rescaling each of the items so that higher scores were associated with preference for risk seeking.…”
Section: Participants and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%