44th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference 2014
DOI: 10.2514/6.2014-2643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Transition and Instabilities in a Mach 6 Hypersonic Quiet Wind Tunnel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, our extensive study has shown that roughness height is an important factor for the amplification/damping effect. For a second mode control design using 2-D roughness as in [29], the roughness height of 50% boundary layer thickness, width of 2 boundary layer thicknesss and spacing of 10 have been chosen. The results in [29] have shown that our design of 2-D roughness successfully damp the second mode.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, our extensive study has shown that roughness height is an important factor for the amplification/damping effect. For a second mode control design using 2-D roughness as in [29], the roughness height of 50% boundary layer thickness, width of 2 boundary layer thicknesss and spacing of 10 have been chosen. The results in [29] have shown that our design of 2-D roughness successfully damp the second mode.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, for the second mode control purpose, the roughness spacing of 10 is used to optimize the stabilization effect on the flow. An experiment of this 2-D roughness controlled second mode design had been applied to a flare cone in Mach 6 quiet tunnel at Purdue university [29]. Their experimental results show the our designed roughness strips have successfully damped the second mode waves.…”
Section: E the Effects Of Roughness Elements Spacingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface of the cone is assumed to be rigid, smooth, and isothermal in this study. This case is chosen because it is a benchmark that has been studied without roughness [24]. In the study of the smooth compression cone at the current freestream condition by Wheaton et al [22], no transition was observed, and the maximum N factor obtained from linear stability equation (LST) reached 14 at the end of the cone.…”
Section: A Test Model and Flow Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transition to turbulence is associated with both global and local changes to temperature occur on the cone followed by a decrease to near laminar levels [113].…”
Section: Potential Impact Of Transitional Boundary Layer On Structuramentioning
confidence: 99%