2006
DOI: 10.1051/jp4:2006134194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical behaviour and temperature measurement during dynamic deformation on split Hopkinson bar of 304L stainless steel and 5754 aluminium alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(10 reference statements)
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work considers AISI 304 stainless steel, a reference metastable austenitic stainless steel for studying the SIMT process at high strain rates since it shows a large amount of transformed martensite even under adiabatic conditions (Rodríguez-Martínez et al, 2011). The new model sheds light on previous experimental results reporting unusual ð> 1Þ values for the Taylor-Quinney coefficient (Rittel et al, 2006;Jovic et al, 2006;Rusinek and Klepaczko, 2009), apparently related to an exothermal phase transformation, through a differential treatment of the dissipative terms, namely latent heat and heat due to austenite and martensite plastic deformation. Likewise the model accounts for the strong coupling existing between martensitic transformation, strain, strain rate, stress state and heat release, thus allowing to perform a thorough analysis of their influence in the evolution of the ratio of dissipated to plastic power and work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This work considers AISI 304 stainless steel, a reference metastable austenitic stainless steel for studying the SIMT process at high strain rates since it shows a large amount of transformed martensite even under adiabatic conditions (Rodríguez-Martínez et al, 2011). The new model sheds light on previous experimental results reporting unusual ð> 1Þ values for the Taylor-Quinney coefficient (Rittel et al, 2006;Jovic et al, 2006;Rusinek and Klepaczko, 2009), apparently related to an exothermal phase transformation, through a differential treatment of the dissipative terms, namely latent heat and heat due to austenite and martensite plastic deformation. Likewise the model accounts for the strong coupling existing between martensitic transformation, strain, strain rate, stress state and heat release, thus allowing to perform a thorough analysis of their influence in the evolution of the ratio of dissipated to plastic power and work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…2 shows the dimension of the tensile specimen and some features of the finite element model. The geometry of the compression specimen is taken from Jovic et al (2006). The mesh consists of 5000 four-node axisymmetric bi-linear elements with reduced integration, CAX4R in ABAQUS notation.…”
Section: Finite Element Models For the Analysis Of The Evolution Of Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…l h is the latent heat per unit volume of transformed austenite, therefore the last term in the above equation accounts for the heat released due to the exothermic character of the phase transformation. This has been reported by different authors for dynamically phase transforming materials (Rittel et al, 2006;Jovic et al, 2006;Rusinek and Klepaczko, 2009) and rationalized in Zaera et al (2013). By virtue of its contribution, the heat power may strongly increase upon a certain range of strain, thus enhancing the coupling between temperature and transformation: SIMT contributes to heat through a latent heat term and heat, in turn, hinders SIMT.…”
Section: D Model: Martensitic Transformation and Yield Conditionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This tendency has been notably observed experimentally by Lerch et al [2003] and Jovic et al [2006] on aluminium alloy and stainless Figure 5. Influence of shear strain rate˙ and initial temperatures T 0 on stress invariant, heating and inelastic heat fraction for the HMSQ-FL-ADD-WYS softening model.…”
Section: Summary and Complementary Analysismentioning
confidence: 56%