2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevmaterials.2.105407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical instability of electrode-electrolyte interfaces in solid-state batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
74
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, even glass solid electrolytes with no grain boundaries suffer from dendrite penetration [32][33][34][35][36]. Similarly, dendrite suppression with soft separators under an external load [16] would also seem to violate its predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, even glass solid electrolytes with no grain boundaries suffer from dendrite penetration [32][33][34][35][36]. Similarly, dendrite suppression with soft separators under an external load [16] would also seem to violate its predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the interfacial instability between electrode particles and solid-state electrolytes, Bucci et al developed an analytical model that analyzes the delamination of such particles from the surrounding SSE. [294] Moreover, these authors derived a stability condition for fracture propagation within the electrode particles. Thermodynamically consistent electro-chemo-mechanical models that can simulate the dynamic response of an all-solid-state battery have also been developed, [127] showing that due to electric field build-up at the electrode-electrolyte interface, Space charge layers (SCLs) are subjected to considerable stresses.…”
Section: Continuum Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Handling of micrometer‐thick sheets becomes very difficult, and the interface of these materials with a lithium‐metal anode is subject to spatial detachment. [ 70 ] The manufacturing processes for oxides involve a high‐temperature sintering process, which is costly but yields an inert sample. [ 64 ] The sulfides, on the contrary, are much softer and have a sufficient ionic conductivity (>1 mS cm −1 ) [ 71 ] even when cold‐pressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%