1983
DOI: 10.1299/jsme1958.26.207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of Pseudo-shock Wave in Supersonic Jet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12͒. It has been observed in flows with M c as low as 0.75 32 and is believed to be a strong contributor to supersonic jet noise. 33 Mach waves are created because a strong instability propagates at supersonic speed with respect to the ambient air ͑or with respect to the lowspeed stream in a shear layer͒.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…12͒. It has been observed in flows with M c as low as 0.75 32 and is believed to be a strong contributor to supersonic jet noise. 33 Mach waves are created because a strong instability propagates at supersonic speed with respect to the ambient air ͑or with respect to the lowspeed stream in a shear layer͒.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…From the velocity profiles, halfwidths Y 0.5 and Z 0.5 were calculated. The pitot pressures were measured using a probe of 0.6 mm outer diameter and 0.4 mm inner diameter, designed according to the recommendations of Nagai [15]. The flow field was captured by pitot probe survey using a three way traversing system.…”
Section: Experimental Set-up and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sonic and underexpanded jets, due to the fluctuating nature of the flow field and also due to the fact that the core region of the underexpanded jets is shock-dominated (where a five-hole or a threehole probe cannot be used), only a single hole Pitot probe designed in accordance with the recommendations of Nagai (12) was used. Rice and Raman (13) have noted in their report that, as the flow exiting from their rectangular nozzle was supersonic, it presented considerable measurement problems in using hot wire or hot film anemometry.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%