2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-7388(04)00197-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms and factors influencing the ultrasonic cleaning of particle-fouled ceramic membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include the asymmetric cavitation near the solid surface that generates microjets in the direction of the surface (Lamminen et al . ). These microjets affect the mass transfer by disturbing the boundary layer of the ultrasound‐treated surfaces.…”
Section: Assisted Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These include the asymmetric cavitation near the solid surface that generates microjets in the direction of the surface (Lamminen et al . ). These microjets affect the mass transfer by disturbing the boundary layer of the ultrasound‐treated surfaces.…”
Section: Assisted Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This can be explained by the compressional deformation of the oil droplets under higher pressure, which passed through the membrane pores into the permeate side, causing an increase in the oil content of the water at the permeate side after filtration, thus decreasing the rejection rate (Lamminen et al . ). The optimal TMP was 0.10 MPa, producing rejection rate of 66.3% and permeate flux of 789.3 L/h/m 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Ultrasonic cleaning utilizes cavitational microstreaming 50 induced by high frequency pressure sound waves to agitate a liquid. In contrast with bubble-array acoustic microstreaming method, for the ultrasonic operation, there is no air pocket needed for the mixing performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%