2014
DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms for Robust Cognition

Abstract: To function well in an unpredictable environment using unreliable components, a system must have a high degree of robustness. Robustness is fundamental to biological systems and is an objective in the design of engineered systems such as airplane engines and buildings. Cognitive systems, like biological and engineered systems, exist within variable environments. This raises the question, how do cognitive systems achieve similarly high degrees of robustness? The aim of this study was to identify a set of mechan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea that participants’ prior experience with benefiting from external normalization contributes to the decision to try to offload raises an important issue. Specifically, as noted above, models of strategy selection that incorporate such an influence (Lovett & Anderson, ; Rieskamp & Otto, ; Walsh & Gluck, ) tend to be based on evidence that participants are influenced by their experience with strategy use within the experiment. However, we did not find similar evidence here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The idea that participants’ prior experience with benefiting from external normalization contributes to the decision to try to offload raises an important issue. Specifically, as noted above, models of strategy selection that incorporate such an influence (Lovett & Anderson, ; Rieskamp & Otto, ; Walsh & Gluck, ) tend to be based on evidence that participants are influenced by their experience with strategy use within the experiment. However, we did not find similar evidence here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This history would arguably be absent for the RW‐UF and UW‐RF displays, despite the fact that external normalization does benefit performance in the former as much as it does in the case of the RW‐RF display. This kind of experienced‐based strategy selection is an important part of at least some models of strategy selection (e.g., Lovett & Anderson, ; Rieskamp & Otto, ; Walsh & Gluck, ), but it has rarely been considered in the cognitive offloading domain, which has focused more on online performance/effort in driving the behavior. The former theories feature a kind of learning mechanism that associates a stimulus/task context with a strategy (still based on performance), and this learning biases strategy selection.…”
Section: Summary Of Experiments 1–4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Which heuristic is ecologically rational to use hence depends on the specific properties of the decision environment. In addition, heuristics can be more robust to variations in environments than optimization approaches, as Walsh, Einstein, and Gluck (2013) recently demonstrated in a series of computer simulations (see also Gluck, 2015 andGluck et al, 2012 on the notion of robustness).…”
Section: The Decision Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-optimal human performance A simple answer to the first question is that people do not behave formally optimal in many decision situations [ 36 ] in general, and in the Sugar Factory in particular [ 14 , 15 ]. The structure of the human cognitive system seems to be geared towards robust information processing in typical human environments with incomplete or uncertain information [ 37 , 38 ], rather than formal optimization given strict assumptions. Another possibility is that the model of human cognition used in this study is not valid to start with.…”
Section: Properties Of the Model And Choice Of Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%