2019
DOI: 10.1029/2018gl081805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Melting of CaSiO3 Perovskite at High Pressure

Abstract: Ab initio molecular dynamics simulations predict that CaSiO3 perovskite melts at 5600 K at 136 GPa, and 6400 K at 300 GPa, significantly higher than MgSiO3 perovskite. The entropy of melting (1.8 kB per atom) is much larger than that of many silicates at ambient pressure and of simple liquids and varies little with pressure. The volume of melting decreases rapidly with increasing pressure, to 3 % at 136 GPa, producing a melting slope that diminishes rapidly with pressure. We determine the melting temperature v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
29
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Using our Z method and the same pseudopotentials, functional, energy cut‐off and cell‐size, our calculated T h is 8806 K at 105 GPa, which is roughly 1700 K higher than 7120 K at 103 GPa found by Braithwaite and Stixrude (2019). Calculations using a similar waiting time analysis as that of Braithwaite and Stixrude (2019) gave a T m of 6493 K at 105 GPa, about 1300 K higher than that reported by Braithwaite and Stixrude (2019) at the same density. To compare directly with the results reported in Figure 1, we also carried out Z‐method calculations using the PBE functional with similar input parameters for the electronic wave function as we used in the two‐phase calculations.…”
Section: Melting Curves Entropy and Kinetics Of Meltingmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Using our Z method and the same pseudopotentials, functional, energy cut‐off and cell‐size, our calculated T h is 8806 K at 105 GPa, which is roughly 1700 K higher than 7120 K at 103 GPa found by Braithwaite and Stixrude (2019). Calculations using a similar waiting time analysis as that of Braithwaite and Stixrude (2019) gave a T m of 6493 K at 105 GPa, about 1300 K higher than that reported by Braithwaite and Stixrude (2019) at the same density. To compare directly with the results reported in Figure 1, we also carried out Z‐method calculations using the PBE functional with similar input parameters for the electronic wave function as we used in the two‐phase calculations.…”
Section: Melting Curves Entropy and Kinetics Of Meltingmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Cpv-curves: Two melting curves, based on classic pair potential molecular dynamics (MD) simulation by Liu et al (2010) include an upper curve, which is uncorrected for overheating, and a lower curve, corrected for 48% overheating by linking it to Zerr et al (1997). The melting curves of Braithwaite and Stixrude (2019) and Wilson and Stixrude (2021) are based on the Z method and two-phase thermodynamics (2PT) method, respectively. (b) The gray circular symbols represent melting points determined by multianvil experiments by Gasparik et al (1994).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The initial composition has an Mg number of 0.895, and it imitates the composition of pyrolite (McDonough & Sun, ; Lyubetskaya & Korenaga, ), with the ternary composition of MgO: 42.2 wt%, FeO: 8.7 wt%, and SiO 2 : 49.1 wt%. The existence of other oxides including Al 2 O 3 and CaO is likely to affect the melting temperature of mantle materials, although more studies are needed to better understand the melting of such oxides (Fiquet et al, ; Andrault et al, ; Braithwaite & Stixrude, ). Results of Monte Carlo inversion in our companion paper (Miyazaki & Korenaga, ) suggest that the nonideality of the mixing becomes negligible when the concentration of an oxide is low enough.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%