1988
DOI: 10.1038/nbt0788-779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Membrane-Based Affinity Technology for Commercial Scale Purifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
94
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
94
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…About ten years ago, it was realized that the selectivity of microfilter membranes could be increased dramatically by the introduction of interactive ionic, hydrophobic, and especially, biospecific groups on the (pore) surface [2]. Through this, the membrane became what at that time was called a membrane absorber [3 -7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About ten years ago, it was realized that the selectivity of microfilter membranes could be increased dramatically by the introduction of interactive ionic, hydrophobic, and especially, biospecific groups on the (pore) surface [2]. Through this, the membrane became what at that time was called a membrane absorber [3 -7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adsorptive membrane substrates should be mechanically resilient and resistant to solvents used to activate coupling and not participate in secondary hydrophobic adsorption, which produces non-specific retention that interferes with product resolution or can lead to the denaturation of biopolymers. Most of the polymers used in manufacturing of microfiltration membranes, such as nylon [10][11][12], polysulfone [13,14] or polyethylene [15], display undesirable surface characteristics leading to strongly non-specific adsorption of proteins on the membrane surfaces. So it is needed to further modify the membranes to improve hydrophilicity of their surface and reduce the non-selective adsorption of proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If it is too short, a significant portion of the solute will remain unbound and exit the column before the ligand sites are saturated. The relationship between the time needed for diffusion to the bead core, t D , and the residence time of the solution on the column, t C , was given by Brandt et al [10] in terms of the Peclet number:…”
Section: Kleinmentioning
confidence: 99%