2016
DOI: 10.24176/re.v6i2.613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Melalui Discovery Learning Berbasis Scientific Approach

Abstract: Mathematical creative thinking ability is one of the capabilities that need to be owned anddeveloped in students who study mathematics from primary to university level. This is due to thoseabilities in accordance with the vision of mathematics, national education goals and learningobjectives of the school mathematics. This paper is a contribution of new ideas for implementingthe curriculum in education so as to develop mathematical creative thinking ability in school.Information about mathematical creative thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
32

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
15
0
32
Order By: Relevance
“…The value means less than p < .05, so H0 is rejected, and Ha is accepted, or it can be concluded that students' ability for two experimental classes and one control class in the final test (post-test) is different or not the same. These results are following the research results of Mandasari (2016), Purwaningrum (2016), Suriany (2016) that students' creative thinking abilities in the experimental class and control class differ significantly. The analysis proceeds to a comparison or posthoc analysis section to find out the differences in the final abilities of the mathematical creative thinking abilities of the two experimental groups, and one control group are presented in Table 7.…”
Section: The Results Of the Research And The Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The value means less than p < .05, so H0 is rejected, and Ha is accepted, or it can be concluded that students' ability for two experimental classes and one control class in the final test (post-test) is different or not the same. These results are following the research results of Mandasari (2016), Purwaningrum (2016), Suriany (2016) that students' creative thinking abilities in the experimental class and control class differ significantly. The analysis proceeds to a comparison or posthoc analysis section to find out the differences in the final abilities of the mathematical creative thinking abilities of the two experimental groups, and one control group are presented in Table 7.…”
Section: The Results Of the Research And The Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The mathematical creative thinking ability is one of ability to discover new ideas and solve math problems creatively Gonzalez, 2017). According to Purwaningrum ( 2016) indicates the creative thinking ability is the ability to find many possible answers to a problem. In addition to the creative thinking ability, it is also necessary independence in problems solving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematical reasoning ability must be familiarized and developed in mathematics learning (Purwaningrum, 2016). The habit of giving mathematical exercises with open-ended problems provides opportunities for students to provide many problems solving with many problem-solving strategies.…”
Section: Somewhat Different From What Was Stated Bymentioning
confidence: 99%