2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00726-021-03061-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-proteomic analysis of the Shandrin mammoth by EVA technology and high-resolution mass spectrometry: what is its gut microbiota telling us?

Abstract: During the last decade, paleoproteomics allowed us to open a direct window into the biological past, improving our understanding of the phylogenetic relationships of extant and extinct species, past human diseases, and reconstruction of the human diet. In particular, meta-proteomic studies, mainly carried out on ancient human dental calculus, provided insights into past oral microbial communities and ancient diets. On the contrary, very few investigations regard the analysis of ancient gut microbiota, which ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The field of paleoproteomics (here defined as the characterization of proteins from archeological and paleontological tissues using mass spectrometry [MS]) has grown exponentially since the first application of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) MS to mammal remains 800–450 000 years old in 2000 . In the 22 years that followed, a variety of mass spectrometry-based methods have been used to investigate the preserved proteomic content of a diverse array of biological tissues (e.g., bones, teeth, baleen, turtle shell, mummified tissues), objects (e.g., paintings, ethnologic objects, potsherds, parchment), and species (e.g., mammoth, moa, giant beaver, whales, sea turtles). ,,,,, However, the vast majority of these studies have focused on relatively young (<100 thousand years old) paleontological and archeological materials and remains. In this perspective, we discuss the development and progress of “deep time paleoproteomics (DTPp)”, here defined as MS characterization of material older than ∼1 million years (1 Ma).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of paleoproteomics (here defined as the characterization of proteins from archeological and paleontological tissues using mass spectrometry [MS]) has grown exponentially since the first application of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) MS to mammal remains 800–450 000 years old in 2000 . In the 22 years that followed, a variety of mass spectrometry-based methods have been used to investigate the preserved proteomic content of a diverse array of biological tissues (e.g., bones, teeth, baleen, turtle shell, mummified tissues), objects (e.g., paintings, ethnologic objects, potsherds, parchment), and species (e.g., mammoth, moa, giant beaver, whales, sea turtles). ,,,,, However, the vast majority of these studies have focused on relatively young (<100 thousand years old) paleontological and archeological materials and remains. In this perspective, we discuss the development and progress of “deep time paleoproteomics (DTPp)”, here defined as MS characterization of material older than ∼1 million years (1 Ma).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altogether, these results supported the hypothesis of a different North Siberia habitat during the Late Pleistocene. Moreover, the composition of microorganism-related peptides found in the trunks surface reflected that observed in the Shandrin mammoth gut (Cucina et al 2021 ), with a predominance of Proteobacteria, followed by Firmicutes, probably attributed to the presence of grass more than tree shrub. Interestingly, in the trunks surface the presence of Firmicutes, and particularly of Bacilli, seemed to be higher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Finally, taking into account the inestimable value of archaeological samples, minimally destructive or non-destructive sampling techniques are needed. One of the more promising non-invasive techniques, known under the acronym EVA (ethylene–vinyl acetate impregnated with hydrophilic and hydrophobic resins) was introduced by Manfredi et al 2017 and recently applied in our lab to a gut tissue sample of a woolly mammoth (i.e., the Shandrin’s mammoth) (Cucina et al 2021 ). In particular, by coupling the EVA technology, a shotgun approach, and the use of high-resolution mass spectrometry it was possible to perform a meta-proteomic analysis which allowed us to get insight into the gut microbiota composition and turned out to be related to the diet of the Shandrin mammoth and its habitat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combination of independent lines of evidence including palynological (pollen) analyses of gut content 28 , multiproxy analyses of dung from the lower intestine (including microscopic, chemical, and molecular techniques such as gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, thermally assisted hydrolysis and methylation, and DNA sequencing) 29 , visual analyses of gut content 30 , fatty acid profiling of fatty tissues 31 , DNA sequencing / metabarcoding of gut and coprolite samples 32 , meta-proteomic analyses by shotgun mass spectrometry of gut tissue samples 33 , DNA metabarcoding, palynological and macrofossil analyses of coprolite (feces) samples 34 , and isotopic analyses of tooth enamel 35 , 36 , suggest that woolly mammoths consumed primarily forbs, graminoids (grasses and sedges), and shrubs, supplementing their diet with trees mosses and even lichen and green algae (as detailed in Supplementary Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%