Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Research 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6546-2_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metacognition-Based Reading Intervention Programs Among Fourth-Grade Hungarian Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, educational programs, which seek to improve General Academic Performance, would focus their efforts on the development of general metacognitive abilities. In spite of the number of studies showing that metacognitive intervention improves academic achievement (Bianchi, 2008;Bigozzi, De Bernart, & Del Vecchio, 2007;Blank, 2000;Csíkos & Steklács, 2010;Juliebö, Malicky, & Norman, 1998;Victor, 2005), further studies should investigate the suggestion aforementioned, incorporating general and specific metacognitive abilities in their intervention (or instruction), and relating them to general and specific achievement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, educational programs, which seek to improve General Academic Performance, would focus their efforts on the development of general metacognitive abilities. In spite of the number of studies showing that metacognitive intervention improves academic achievement (Bianchi, 2008;Bigozzi, De Bernart, & Del Vecchio, 2007;Blank, 2000;Csíkos & Steklács, 2010;Juliebö, Malicky, & Norman, 1998;Victor, 2005), further studies should investigate the suggestion aforementioned, incorporating general and specific metacognitive abilities in their intervention (or instruction), and relating them to general and specific achievement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the mere knowledge about how to read and knowledge about which strategies are most suitable to use does not influence comprehension by itself. Therefore the research results are mixed -from those which do not confirm direct connections between metacognitive knowledge and reading comprehension (Cromley & Azavedo, 2006 by ninth grade students; by fifth grade students) to the results that show significant correlations between both concepts (Kolić-Vehovec, Csikos & Steklacs, 2010).…”
Section: Metacognitive Knowledge About Reading and Summarizingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In our first model, based on the students' results before the intervention programme, we entered the variables, which showed to be the strongest predictors of summarizing according to empirical studies: GRC and MKR (Borella et al, 2010;Efklides, 2014;Gerst et al, 2015;Kolić Vehovec et al, 2009;Csikos & Steklacs, 2010). Next to the GRC and MKR, we entered the currently developed summarizing skills in the second and the third model (in model 2 Summ_1 and in model 3 Summ_1 and Summ_2).…”
Section: Predictors Of Achievement In Summarizing By Eg and Cgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Csíkos, 2008;Csíkos és Steklács, 2010). A hatékony olvasástanítás támogatása érdekében az olvasás tartalmi kereteinek ezt a területet is érinteniük kell, akkor is, ha a diagnosztikus mérésbe ez még nem bevonható.…”
Section: Olvasási Stratégiákunclassified
“…A rész-letes tartalmi keretekben a stratégiák elsőtől a hatodik osztályig jelennek meg, ezek után a megtanult stratégiák gyakorlását, szintetizálását javasoljuk. Eredményes hazai fejlesztő kísérletben igazoltuk a stratégiaalapú olvasásfejlesztés lehetőségeit magyar 4. osztályos tanulók körében (Csíkos és Steklács, 2010).…”
Section: Olvasási Stratégiák Szövegek Szövegértésunclassified