1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf03221012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal-matrix composites and IPM: A modeling perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 The result is typically a 200 µm thick monotape containing parallel, evenly spaced 140 µm SCS-6 silicon carbide fibers in a porous matrix ( Figure 2). The monotapes are laid-up to create a preform with the desired fiber architecture and then either hot isostatically pressed or vacuum hot pressed to near-net shape.…”
Section: Case Study: Processing Titanium-matrix Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…23 The result is typically a 200 µm thick monotape containing parallel, evenly spaced 140 µm SCS-6 silicon carbide fibers in a porous matrix ( Figure 2). The monotapes are laid-up to create a preform with the desired fiber architecture and then either hot isostatically pressed or vacuum hot pressed to near-net shape.…”
Section: Case Study: Processing Titanium-matrix Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They include foil-fiber-foil, 51 vapor-phase fiber coating, 52-54 powder cloth, 55 and molten-droplet spray deposition. 23 Each reduces or even eliminates liquid matrix-fiber contact, but all require additional lay-up and consolidation process steps to achieve a near-netshape composite.…”
Section: Case Study: Processing Titanium-matrix Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation