2012
DOI: 10.1177/1040638712452110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metastatic cholangiocarcinoma in a llama (Lama glama)

Abstract: A 2-year-old female llama (Lama glama) from a private zoological park was submitted to the Pathology Department of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine from Cluj-Napoca (Romania) for necropsy. The animal had a history of depression, anorexia, progressive weakening, ataxia, decubitus ulcers, fever, dyspnea, and abdominal distension. Death occurred 6 weeks after the onset of clinical signs. Necropsy, and cytological, histological, and immunohistochemical examinations were performed. Grossly, the animal was emaciat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No extrapulmonary nodules were identified. Other tumours previously reported in the lungs of NWCs include multicentric lymphosarcoma in llamas and alpacas, [6][7][8][9] metastatic malignant melanoma in alpacas, 10 11 metastatic cholangiocarcinoma in a llama 12 and metastatic nephroblastoma in a guanaco (L guanicoe). 13 In 2014, the WHO guidelines for the classification of lung tumours in humans were updated such that classification is now based on histological pattern rather than possible cell of origin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No extrapulmonary nodules were identified. Other tumours previously reported in the lungs of NWCs include multicentric lymphosarcoma in llamas and alpacas, [6][7][8][9] metastatic malignant melanoma in alpacas, 10 11 metastatic cholangiocarcinoma in a llama 12 and metastatic nephroblastoma in a guanaco (L guanicoe). 13 In 2014, the WHO guidelines for the classification of lung tumours in humans were updated such that classification is now based on histological pattern rather than possible cell of origin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%