2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metformin Pharmacokinetics in Mouse Tumors: Implications for Human Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

8
116
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
8
116
2
Order By: Relevance
“…6a-c), consistent with metformin pharmacokinetics in other tumour-bearing mice given metformin in drinking water 17,18 . No difference in serum glucose and lactate levels were seen (Extended Data Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6a-c), consistent with metformin pharmacokinetics in other tumour-bearing mice given metformin in drinking water 17,18 . No difference in serum glucose and lactate levels were seen (Extended Data Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
“…Our study suggests that the metformin levels achieved in our GEMMs were too low to inhibit tumour growth. Although the metformin doses used here were comparable with clinically effective doses for diabetes treatment in humans, species differences in the pharmacodynamics and/or pharmacokinetics of metformin could make it difficult to translate these responses from mouse to humans 17,18 . While the response to metformin is dose-dependent, our data support the results of in vitro studies that show that manipulating ROS can modulate the response of tumours to SG starvation 7 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, further preclinical pharmacokinetics studies of MetF coadministered with the first-line antitubercular regimen are urgently needed to guide the future study of this promising agent in clinical trials (19,20). In addition, detailed pharmacodynamics studies are required to relate plasma drug exposures in mice to AMPK activation and anti-TB activity in cell culture systems (6,21). Finally, it is important to recognize that observations made in the mouse model are not necessarily predictive of outcomes in clinical trials of TB treatment nor is early "sterilization" a predictor of cure in humans (22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That metformin could not entirely restore the abundance of H3K27me3 occurring in the liver of HFD‐fed animals (Vella et al., 2013) might reflect the epigenetic incapacity of HFD‐damaged tissues to fully benefit from the expected response to metformin unless combined with diet reversal (Riera‐Borrull et al., 2017). At a dose of 250 mg kg −1  day −1 i.p., a route of administration that is equivalent to 1,200 mg/day metformin for a 60 kg individual (Reagan‐Shaw, Nihal & Ahmad, 2008) and yields plasma concentrations in the low micromolar range (Chandel et al., 2016; Dowling et al., 2016; Memmott et al., 2010; Menendez, Martin‐Castillo & Joven, 2016), metformin treatment resulted in a significant twofold reduction in the tumor volume in xenograft‐bearing mice highly enriched with tumor‐initiating cancer stem cells (CSC) (Cufi et al., 2012; Martin‐Castillo et al., 2013; Oliveras‐Ferraros et al., 2012) that was accompanied by a noteworthy twofold augmentation of global H3K27me3 in tumor tissues. Because decreased abundance of H3K27me3 is a predictor of cancer aggressiveness independently of the expression of the H3K27me3 methyltransferase EZH2 (Holm et al., 2012; Wei et al., 2008) closely related to the maintenance of poorly differentiated CSC (Sakaki et al., 2015; Yan et al., 2017), our findings suggest that metformin might exert a suppressive influence on the CSC phenotype by enhancing deposition of the repressive H3K27me3 mark.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%