Methane Emission and Milk Production of Dairy Cows Grazing Pastures Rich in Legumes or Rich in Grasses in Uruguay

Abstract

Simple SummaryGHGs emissions are relevant in evaluating environmental impact of farming systems. Methane (CH4) produced by enteric fermentation accounts for half of all anthropogenic emissions of GHGs in Uruguay, where ruminant production is based on year round grazing of forages. Here we compared milk production and CH4 emissions by dairy cows grazing two contrasting mixed pastures (rich in legumes or rich in grasses) using the SF6 tracer technique adapted to collect breath samples over 5-days periods. There were no differences in milk or CH4 production between the contrasting pastures, probably because of the high herbage allowance that enabled selective grazing by cows.AbstractUnderstanding the impact of changing pasture composition on reducing emissions of GHGs in dairy grazing systems is an important issue to mitigate climate change. The aim of this study was to estimate daily CH4 emissions of dairy cows grazing two mixed pastures with contrasting composition of grasses and legumes: L pasture with 60% legumes on Dry Matter (DM) basis and G pasture with 75% grasses on DM basis. Milk production and CH4 emissions were compared over two periods of two weeks during spring using eight lactating Holstein cows in a 2 × 2 Latin square design. Herbage organic matter intake (HOMI) was estimated by chromic oxide dilution and herbage organic matter digestibility (OMD) was estimated by faecal index. Methane emission was estimated by using the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique adapted to collect breath samples over 5-day periods. OMD (0.71) and HOMI (15.7 kg OM) were not affected by pasture composition. Milk production (20.3 kg/d), milk fat yield (742 g/d) and milk protein yield (667 g/d) were similar for both pastures. This may be explained by the high herbage allowance (30 kg DM above 5 cm/cow) which allowed the cows to graze selectively, in particular in grass sward. Similarly, methane emission expressed as absolute value (368 g/d or 516 L/d) or expressed as methane yield (6.6% of Gross Energy Intake (GEI)) was not affected by treatments. In conclusion, at high herbage allowance, the quality of the diet selected by grazing cows did not differ between pastures rich in legumes or rich in grasses, and therefore there was no effect on milk or methane production.

Producción de Metano en Vacunos al Pastoreo Suplementados con Ensilado, Concentrado y Taninos en el Altiplano Peruano en Época Seca

“…En la calibración del equipo se utilizaron cuatro estándares (Scott-Marring, Figura 2. Tasa de permeación en tubos de SF 6 , g EEUU), estándar 1: CH 4 10.50 ppmv ± 1% y SF 6 8.82 pptv ± 10%, estándar 2: CH 4 50.8 ppmv ± 1% y SF 6 78.40 pptv ± 5%, estándar 3: CH 4 103.00 ppmv ± 1% y SF 6 157.8 pptv ± 5%, estándar 4: CH 4 311.00 ppmv ± 1% y SF 6 289.60 pptv ± 5%. Al inicio de cada lectura diaria se corrió el estándar 3, así como corridas de blancos electrónicos entre muestra y muestra.…”

Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Beef Cow-Calf Grazing Systems in Uruguay

“…Methane emissions from enteric fermentation were calculated using the methane conversion factor (Ym) which is the percent of gross energy (GE) loss by methane, using the average default IPCC value (6.5%), which is similar to the Ym measured in Uruguay for dairy cows (Dini et al, 2012). Methane emissions from manure were estimated considering pasture management system according to IPCC (2006), that is, manure deposited during grazing.…”

Methane mitigation and ruminal fermentation changes in cows fed cottonseed and vitamin E

“…Methane release in the cecum and colon (C&C) was considered to be 5 % of total methane release. Enteric methane is produced mainly in the rumen (95 %) and, to a smaller extent (5 %), in the large intestine (Dini et al, 2012).…”