2008
DOI: 10.1002/app.28072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methanol permeability and proton conductivity of direct methanol fuel cell membranes based on sulfonated poly(vinyl alcohol)–layered silicate nanocomposites

Abstract: Layered silicate nanocomposite membranes to be used as electrolyte polymeric membranes in a direct methanol fuel cell were prepared through the mixing of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) with various amounts (2, 4, and 5% w/w) of sodium montmorillonite layered silicate nanoclay. The proton conductivity of the polymer was induced by the reaction of the polymer with sulfosuccinic acid. After that, a solution of the sulfonated PVA-layered silicate nanocomposite was cast into membranes. The proton conductivity and methan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results might be related to the interaction between sodium montmorillonite and PVA, exfoliation of the nanoclay in the polymer composite, and changes in the degree of crystallinity of the polymer with the nanoclay content. The optimum level of layered silicate sodium montmorillonite is achieved at which the maximum C/P ratio of the nanocomposite membrane was 2% (w/w) [109].…”
Section: Inorganic Organic Composite Membranementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results might be related to the interaction between sodium montmorillonite and PVA, exfoliation of the nanoclay in the polymer composite, and changes in the degree of crystallinity of the polymer with the nanoclay content. The optimum level of layered silicate sodium montmorillonite is achieved at which the maximum C/P ratio of the nanocomposite membrane was 2% (w/w) [109].…”
Section: Inorganic Organic Composite Membranementioning
confidence: 99%
“…22.15). This behavior is possibly due to the low affinity of unmodified MMT towards water compared to the sulfonated PVOH along with reduced number of hydrophilic groups (due to the H-bonding between the surface -OH groups of MMT and -SO 3 H groups of sulfonated PVOH) [118]. On the contrary, lower water affinity of MMT compared to PWA reduced the water uptake of the PVA-PWA-MMT composite compared to that of the PVA-PWA composite membranes [110].…”
Section: Water Uptakementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The concentration of methanol in compartment B was determined at different times using a gas chromatograph (Make: Nucon Gas Chromatograph India, Model: 5765) equipped with flame ion detector (FID). Methanol permeability (P) at 30 C and 60% RH was calculated by the below given formula reported in literature [13],…”
Section: Methanol Crossovermentioning
confidence: 99%