1990
DOI: 10.1080/09593339009384855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method for assessing the contribution of environmental tobacco smoke to respirable suspended particles in indoor environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20,21,26 Briefly, RSP was determined by weighing the filters in triplicate on an electrobalance (Sartorius Model 2405) after overnight incubation at 50% humidity. The filters were then placed under an ionizing unit (Staticmaster, NRD, Inc.) for 5-10 min to eliminate static electricity effects.…”
Section: Analysis Of Particulate-phase Constituentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20,21,26 Briefly, RSP was determined by weighing the filters in triplicate on an electrobalance (Sartorius Model 2405) after overnight incubation at 50% humidity. The filters were then placed under an ionizing unit (Staticmaster, NRD, Inc.) for 5-10 min to eliminate static electricity effects.…”
Section: Analysis Of Particulate-phase Constituentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This decline in response for both types of combustion aerosols is suggestive of some degree of saturation in the PAS 2000's response. FPM typically has been used as an indicator of combustion-derived PM in ETS exposure studies 20,21,28 and is considered to be related to the relative quantity of aromatic hydrocarbons present in the PM of indoor air particulates. Its relative quantity in ETS does vary among cigarette brands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of them, ultraviolet particulate matter (UVPM) and fluorescing particulate matter (FPM), reflect the airborne levels of combustion aerosols . These markers can be determined simultaneously Conner et al, 1990) and have been used extensively in similar studies to provide a more selective assessment of ETS contribution to RSP . The third marker, solanesol particulate matter (Sol-PM), has become increasingly used in recent studies.…”
Section: Area Sampling and Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extract was injected into an HPLC equipped with a UV detector and a fluorescence detector in series, and connected directly to an autosampler by short tubing. The readings were expressed as equivalent concentrations of surrogate standards (2,2 0 ,4,4 0 -tetrahydroxybenzophenone for UV and scopoletin for fluorescence), and converted to UVPM and FPM concentrations using conversion factors (Conner et al, 1990;Nelson et al,1997Nelson et al, , 1998ASTM, D 5955-96, 1996). The air concentration of solanesol was determined by HPLC analysis of the same extract .…”
Section: Analytical Determinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These have been determined by a number of authors [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Ogden et al [8] were among the first to determine such ETS-RSP factors using the controlled chamber method [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%