2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method to obtain standard pseudosections from pseudo pole–dipole arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We carried out the inversion of the mixed organized dataset using the dynamic model presented in The inversion of the datasets was carried out using the commercial Res2dinvx64 software (Geotomo software) with the robust inversion method. To simulate the effect of experimental errors, we added noise using the following expression (Bellmunt and Marcuello, 2011):…”
Section: Data Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We carried out the inversion of the mixed organized dataset using the dynamic model presented in The inversion of the datasets was carried out using the commercial Res2dinvx64 software (Geotomo software) with the robust inversion method. To simulate the effect of experimental errors, we added noise using the following expression (Bellmunt and Marcuello, 2011):…”
Section: Data Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant resistivity changes during data acquisition can lead to low resolution images and low convergence of data (Wilkinson et al, 2010). The acquisition time is directly related to the amount of data and the multichannel acquisition efficiency (Bellmunt and Marcuello, 2011). As a general rule, increasing the amount of data will increase resolution, but the improvement begins to level off at large amount of data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shows that four 2‐pole measurements are needed for a single 4‐pole measurement using the principle of superposition. Others have used the same principle to convert a base set of 3‐pole data to a comprehensive 3‐pole set (Blome et al 2011), convert 3‐pole data to 4‐pole data (Candansayar & Başokur 2001; Bellmunt & Marcuello 2011) or convert a particular array of 4‐pole data to any other 4‐pole array (Sri Niwas & Israil 1989). For the 20‐electrode case, we can expect 14 535 non‐reciprocal 4‐pole calculations ( N ), per combinatorial rule: (Rucker et al 2011) which expands to (Xu & Noel 1993; Loke et al 2010) where n is the number of electrodes.…”
Section: Synthetic Modelling Examplementioning
confidence: 99%