2016
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-915x2016000100003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodology for the preparation of construction project waste management plans based on innovation and productive thinking processes: a case study in Chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Por otra parte, el sector de la construcción en el mundo contribuye en un 40% al total de emisiones de dióxido de carbono, 36% de energía (Huang et al, 2018), consume 50% de los recursos naturales, 16% del consumo de agua y produce 50% de los residuos totales generados por un país (Aldana y Serpell, 2016). En Chile las cifras no son tan distintas ya que el sector construcción aporta con un 33% al total de emisiones de dióxido de carbono (Kairies-Alvarado, 2021), consume 50% de los recursos naturales, 26% de energía, 6% del consumo de agua (MINVU, 2018) y produce el 37 % de los residuos totales generados en el país (Bravo et al, 2019).…”
Section: Rodríguez-grauunclassified
“…Por otra parte, el sector de la construcción en el mundo contribuye en un 40% al total de emisiones de dióxido de carbono, 36% de energía (Huang et al, 2018), consume 50% de los recursos naturales, 16% del consumo de agua y produce 50% de los residuos totales generados por un país (Aldana y Serpell, 2016). En Chile las cifras no son tan distintas ya que el sector construcción aporta con un 33% al total de emisiones de dióxido de carbono (Kairies-Alvarado, 2021), consume 50% de los recursos naturales, 26% de energía, 6% del consumo de agua (MINVU, 2018) y produce el 37 % de los residuos totales generados en el país (Bravo et al, 2019).…”
Section: Rodríguez-grauunclassified
“…In addition, the use of RCDW presents positive results from an environmental, technical and economic point of view (Awed et al, 2021;Beja et al, 2020;Arab et al, 2020;Tarbay et al, 2019). During the last years, instead of disposing of construction and demolition waste (CDW) in landfills, this material has been considered for replacing natural aggregates (Aldana & Serpell, 2016;Martinez et al, 2016). Sustainable pavements using recycled materials have become essential for maintaining natural resources, reducing potential environmental impacts, and improving the potential economic value of recycling (Dong et al, 2017).…”
Section: Brief State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We sought an idea from a professional with at least 20 years of working experience in construction management and who has participated in many construction projects in which he experienced construction first-hand information. [37,38] Time pressure [39,40] Difficulties for delivery vehicles accessing construction sites [41,42] 2 Transportation problem [43,44] Lack of supervision [45] Inefficient method of unloading [46,47] 3 Incorrect Procurement [48,49] Lack of on-site waste management plans [50,51] Insufficient protections during unloading [50,52] 4 Lack of design standards for reducing construction waste [53,54] Use of incorrect material requiring replacement [54,55] Waste resulting from cutting uneconomical shapes [56,57] 5 Low cost for construction waste disposal [58,59] Poor craftsmanship [60,61] Damage to materials on-site [62] 6…”
Section: Waste Reduction Hierarchy On 3r (Reduce Reuse and Recycle)mentioning
confidence: 99%