2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-78030-6_69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods for Seafood Authenticity Testing in Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 320 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Is widely recognize that in highly processed food (canned or cooked), the DNA is fragmented below 300 bp, leading to extracting less and degraded DNA [9,67]. The HRM analysis use amplicons shorter than 300 bp [11] and the sensitivity of detection is enhanced in smaller amplicons [65]; therefore, it is ideal for genetic analysis of highly processed food. In our method, the size of the amplicons sizes were between 50 to 170 bp, appropriated to be successfully genotyped in processed food.…”
Section: Fitness For Purpose Assessment Of the Multi-locus Pcr-hrm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Is widely recognize that in highly processed food (canned or cooked), the DNA is fragmented below 300 bp, leading to extracting less and degraded DNA [9,67]. The HRM analysis use amplicons shorter than 300 bp [11] and the sensitivity of detection is enhanced in smaller amplicons [65]; therefore, it is ideal for genetic analysis of highly processed food. In our method, the size of the amplicons sizes were between 50 to 170 bp, appropriated to be successfully genotyped in processed food.…”
Section: Fitness For Purpose Assessment Of the Multi-locus Pcr-hrm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also affect food safety via unnoticed consumption of allergens due to undeclared species [7,8]. Seafood mislabeling is well documented throughout history [9,10]; it impacts not only food authenticity [11] but also allows the trade in the markets of endangered species or products from illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fisheries, threatening wildlife [12], hampering conservation and negatively affecting consumers decisions [13]. Nowadays, the breadth and depth of mislabeling are coming into sharper focus, thanks to DNA-based species verification methods [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they noted that wild-caught or mariculture production was underestimated, and further work would be required to "ground-truth" or verify the provenance of seafood. Furthermore, the existing databases in countries like Europe focus on utilising DNA profiles of seafood [19,20]. Another database of note is the Barcode of Life Data System, which contains the DNA barcodes of 244k animal species [21] and has been successfully used to detect species mislabelling [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the markets, as well as served cooked in restaurants. Under these conditions, their morphological characteristics are altered; thus, identification of the species is often not possible, raising opportunities for fraudulent operations [ 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%