2016
DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2016.1157761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MethyRNA: a web server for identification of N6-methyladenosine sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
95
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspired by Chen et al .’s works1011, Zhou and his co-workers also proposed a mammalian m 6 A site predictor named SRAMP12. Subsequently, a webserver called MethyRNA was proposed to identify m 6 A sites in H. sapiens and M. musculus 13. Although the performances of existing methods are satisfactory for identifying m 6 A site in mammalian transcriptomes13, they fails to accurately identify m 6 A site in yeast12.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inspired by Chen et al .’s works1011, Zhou and his co-workers also proposed a mammalian m 6 A site predictor named SRAMP12. Subsequently, a webserver called MethyRNA was proposed to identify m 6 A sites in H. sapiens and M. musculus 13. Although the performances of existing methods are satisfactory for identifying m 6 A site in mammalian transcriptomes13, they fails to accurately identify m 6 A site in yeast12.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, a webserver called MethyRNA was proposed to identify m 6 A sites in H. sapiens and M. musculus 13. Although the performances of existing methods are satisfactory for identifying m 6 A site in mammalian transcriptomes13, they fails to accurately identify m 6 A site in yeast12. This may be due to the fact that the information around the yeast m 6 A site has not been fully characterized12.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, to reduce redundancy and bias, none of the included RNA segments had pairwise sequence identity with any other in a same subset. By strictly following the above procedures, we obtained an array of benchmark datasets with different ξ values and hence different lengths of RNA samples (2ξ+1) as well (see Equation 1), as illustrated belowdouble-struckSξ(normal⊛){23nucleotides,whenξ=1125nucleotides,whenξ=1227nucleotides,whenξ=1339nucleotides,whenξ=1941nucleotides,whenξ=2043nucleotides,whenξ=21,where the symbol means “formed by.” It was observed via preliminary tests as well as many reports19, 43, 66 that when ξ=20 (i.e., the RNA samples formed by 41 nucleotides [nt]), the corresponding results were most promising. Accordingly, hereafter we only consider the 41-nt RNA sequences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem is naturally a supervised learning task, which aims to train predictive models for each type by using labeled positive and negative modification sites. There is a large collection of algorithms for predicting m 6 A sites from mRNA sequences [4][5][6][7][8][9][10], most notably SRAMP. However, such predictive algorithms for other modifications are still scarce because training robust models for these modification sites face several challenges [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%