2015
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2015001100001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Métodos de destruição de restos de cultura do algodoeiro e sobrevivência do bicudo

Abstract: Resumo: O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a eficiência de métodos de destruição dos restos de cultura do algodoeiro (Gossypium hirsutum) para a redução da população remanescente do bicudo-do-algodoeiro (Anthonomus grandis). O experimento foi conduzido em blocos ao acaso, com quatro repetições e cinco tratamentos: roçagem, com aplicação de 2,4-D e beta-ciflutrina; roçagem, com aplicação de 2,4-D e glifosato; roçagem e gradagem; roçagem, com aplicação de 2,4-D e beta-ciflutrina, além de gradagem; e testemunh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
23
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Distrito Federal and in the state of Goiás, nearly all boll weevils at the end of the crop did not remain protected within the dry bolls for more than 50 days, but probably left in search of shelter and food in the surrounding areas (Figure 3). This result reinforces the importance of destroying cotton stalks for boll weevil management, since, at any time, adults who have left the structures are able to colonize the regrowth of cotton plants after harvest (Paula et al, 2013;Ribeiro et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In the Distrito Federal and in the state of Goiás, nearly all boll weevils at the end of the crop did not remain protected within the dry bolls for more than 50 days, but probably left in search of shelter and food in the surrounding areas (Figure 3). This result reinforces the importance of destroying cotton stalks for boll weevil management, since, at any time, adults who have left the structures are able to colonize the regrowth of cotton plants after harvest (Paula et al, 2013;Ribeiro et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In general, lower regrowth percentages were observed in all treatments with herbicides, compared with the untreated control, except for LEM-BA in 2014. In the Brazilian Cerrado region, the absence of more effective control, as observed in the present study, can favor the survival of boll weevil (Ribeiro et al, 2015), which is the reason why the Brazilian legislation of plant sanitary defense of the states Goiás and Bahia recommends that, during the sanitary fallow period, there should be no cotton stalk regrowth, i.e., all plants should be destroyed by chemical (herbicide) or physical (mechanical) processes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Cotton stalk destruction after harvest is a very important strategy of the integrated pest management (Lima et al, 2013;Grigolli et al, 2015). After harvest, crop residues and stalks can be eliminated by soil tillage implements such as plow and plowing harrow (Bianchini & Borges, 2013;Ribeiro et al, 2015;Sofiatti et al, 2015), although devices have been developed to improve the operational capacity of the destruction and promote minimum soil mobilization (Sofiatti et al, 2015). Nevertheless, this form of destruction, besides having low operational efficiency, does not always conform to the principles of the no-till system (NTS), a conservation system that favors the mitigation of greenhouse gases (Corbeels et al, 2016;Sant-Anna et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cotton crop (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is attacked by a wide variety of phytophagous arthropods with potential to cause serious damage to culture (RIBEIRO et al, 2015). Among these, the boll weevil Anthonomus grandis Boheman (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) is a key pest of cotton in the new world (SALVADOR et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%