2004
DOI: 10.1300/j134v08n04_03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mexico's Progresa Program (1997–2000): An Example of Neo-Liberal Poverty Alleviation Programs Concerned with Gender, Human Capital Development, Responsibility and Choice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this neoliberal logic, there is a shift in how beneficiaries are conceived: from being clients (i.e. passive receivers of welfare services), they start to become consumers (Luccisano, ). This approach shifts the responsibility of well‐being from the state to low‐income individuals, and structural causes of poverty and inequalities are not addressed.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this neoliberal logic, there is a shift in how beneficiaries are conceived: from being clients (i.e. passive receivers of welfare services), they start to become consumers (Luccisano, ). This approach shifts the responsibility of well‐being from the state to low‐income individuals, and structural causes of poverty and inequalities are not addressed.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De plus, quand tel est le cas, les pays pionniers en la matière, le Mexique (Adato et autres 2000; Escobar Latapí et Gonzalez de la Rocha 2004;Luccisano 2004;Molyneux 2007) et le Brésil (Aparecido 2009;Feijoo 2007;Klein 2005;Paz 2010), sont privilégiés.…”
Section: Nora Nagelsunclassified
“…Untuk itu diperlukan strategi lain yang dapat meningkatkan kesejahteraan secara berkelanjutan. Berdasarkan pengalaman di negara lain, skim bantuan tunai bersyarat (conditional cash transfer) atau bantuan padat karya (welfare to work) merupakan bentuk alternatif program untuk peningkatan kesejahteraan keluarga (Luccisano 2004;Williamson & Salkie 2005 Investasi dalam pendidikan dan pelatihan merupakan instrumen yang mempunyai potensi besar dalam upaya menurunkan perbedaan pendapatan dan meningkatkan produktivitas serta memberikan pendapatan kepada golongan ekonomi bawah (Radwan 1995). Perbaikan pendidikan mengakibatkan peningkatan produktivitas dalam pertanian, karena petani yang berpendidikan cenderung memiliki rasa keingintahuan yang lebih tinggi akan teknik produksi dan cepat inovasi baru.…”
Section: Strategi Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Keluargaunclassified