“…The mainstream neural networks mai- ntain high recognition rates for recognizing SAR targets without noise interference, however, the recognition performance plummeted after the addition of a little noise to the testing set. When the parameter a is set to 1, the recognition rates of Res-Net18, RestNet50, SIN-CNN [12], EfficieNetV2, Wavelet-SRNet [14], RestNet18 with DWT (Discrete Wavelet Transform), MFFA-SARNet [55], A_ConvNet [1], and MFCNN [13] drop sharply from 96.19%, 94.88%, 98.81%, 99.30%, 97.5%, 97.81%, 95.78%, 95.21% and 96.88% to 74.65%, 61.47%, 36.30%, 57.5%, 50.33%, 56.28%, 53.96%, 63.59% and 52.15%, respectively. In the same condition, the recognition rates of our method only show a mild decrease from 98.21% to 93.60%.…”