2009
DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2010.00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MIC versus MBEC to Determine the Antibiotic Sensitivity of Staphylococcus aureus in Peritoneal Dialysis Peritonitis

Abstract: In PD peritonitis that is long standing, recurrent, or not responsive to therapy, MBEC testing should be considered as a biofilm may be present. Gentamicin should be strongly considered over other agents for empiric gram-negative coverage as it may be providing synergy in the setting of Staphylococcus aureus. Also, the newer anti-staphylococcal drugs should be tested for their performance in a biofilm using the MBEC method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
51
0
10

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
51
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…To kill the microorganisms in biofilm-related implant infections, much higher antimicrobial concentrations are needed. The minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC), an in vitro estimate of the lowest antimicrobial concentration that will kill all the microorganisms in a biofilm, including the persister cells, can be hundreds-to thousands-times higher than the MIC for the same antimicrobial-microorganism pair [1,[5][6][7][16][17][18]. The clinically important distinction between MBEC for bacteria in biofilm and MIC or MBC for bacteria in a planktonic (floating) state is that persister cells in biofilm are not accessible to killing by the host.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To kill the microorganisms in biofilm-related implant infections, much higher antimicrobial concentrations are needed. The minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC), an in vitro estimate of the lowest antimicrobial concentration that will kill all the microorganisms in a biofilm, including the persister cells, can be hundreds-to thousands-times higher than the MIC for the same antimicrobial-microorganism pair [1,[5][6][7][16][17][18]. The clinically important distinction between MBEC for bacteria in biofilm and MIC or MBC for bacteria in a planktonic (floating) state is that persister cells in biofilm are not accessible to killing by the host.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies of well-characterized bacterial strains [12,31,49] and clinical bacterial isolates from biofilmbased infections [6,45,48,54], the antimicrobial concentration required to kill bacteria in biofilms can be 100 to 1000 times greater than the minimum inhibitory concentration for the planktonic form. Because the antimicrobial concentrations required to manage biofilm often exceed the concentrations at which systemic toxicity is prohibitive, surgical débridement and local antimicrobial delivery are necessary [10,13,14,56].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urokinase instillation in Tenckhoff catheters was also more common in repeat than in non-repeated peritonitis. Of interest, it has recently been suggested that the minimal biofilm eradication concentration, instead of the minimum inhibitory concentration, may be the preferred therapeutic target for determining antibiotic therapy for confirmed or suspected cases of biofilmassociated repeat infections [39]. On the other hand, it is generally not known whether repeat episodes are caused by the same strain of bacteria hidden in the biofilm-a determination which requires phage typing of the bacterial isolates for confirmation.…”
Section: Treatment Of Repeat Peritonitismentioning
confidence: 99%