2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro-CT for saw mark analysis on human bone

Abstract: Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible in many cases to distinguish marks created by serrated blades from those of non‐serrated blades. Serrated blades (e.g., bread and table knives) typically impart shallower cut marks, with asymmetrical profiles and flatter, wider floors along with regularly spaced striations along kerf walls, than do smooth blades (e.g., scalpels, pocket knives), which tend to produce deeper cut marks with symmetrical, V‐shaped profiles and irregular, haphazard, or no striations (Crowder, Rainwater, & Fridie, 2011, 2013; Greenfield, 1999; Norman et al, 2018; Tegtmeyer, 2012). Stabbing motions aimed perpendicularly to the bone surface also result in distinctive plan view morphologies between blade types (Thompson & Inglis, 2009).…”
Section: Classes Of Bone Surface Modifications and Their Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is possible in many cases to distinguish marks created by serrated blades from those of non‐serrated blades. Serrated blades (e.g., bread and table knives) typically impart shallower cut marks, with asymmetrical profiles and flatter, wider floors along with regularly spaced striations along kerf walls, than do smooth blades (e.g., scalpels, pocket knives), which tend to produce deeper cut marks with symmetrical, V‐shaped profiles and irregular, haphazard, or no striations (Crowder, Rainwater, & Fridie, 2011, 2013; Greenfield, 1999; Norman et al, 2018; Tegtmeyer, 2012). Stabbing motions aimed perpendicularly to the bone surface also result in distinctive plan view morphologies between blade types (Thompson & Inglis, 2009).…”
Section: Classes Of Bone Surface Modifications and Their Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good deal of actualistic work focuses on saw marks, especially those generated by the toothed blades of saws, in order to aid tool identification in cases of postmortem dismemberment (Bailey, Wang, van de Goot, & Gerretsen, 2011; Berger, Pokines, & Moore, 2018; Cerutti et al, 2016; Greer, 2018; Love, Derrick, & Wiersema, 2013; Love, Derrick, Wiersema, & Peters, 2015; Nogueira, Alunni, Bernardi, & Quatrehomme, 2018; Nogueira, Quatrehomme, Rallon, Adalian, & Alunni, 2016; Norman et al, 2018; Pelletti et al, 2017; Saville, Hainsworth, & Rutty, 2007; Symes et al, 2010; Williams & Davis, 2017). As with cut marks, the widths of saw mark kerfs correlate positively with the functional width of saw blades and are, thus, indicative of saw types (although we note that overlap in kerf width exists across these implements as well).…”
Section: Classes Of Bone Surface Modifications and Their Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two more recent studies detailed the use of Micro-CT scanning in the determination of different blades on human bones. The first by Pellettia et al [14] using four different hand saws to determine which saw had caused the different marks on the bones, while the second study by Norman et al [15] used a mixture of power saws, hand powered saws, and knives, to leave marks on long bones. All these studies illustrate the usefulness of Micro-CT scanning as a tool in the investigation and identification of bone damage caused by different tools and weapons.…”
Section: Micro-ct Scannermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the methods allowing the quantification of the geometry and structure of the diagenetically altered bone is a high‐resolution computed microtomography (micro‐CT) (Beck et al, 2012; Hayashi et al, 2011; Robson Brown et al, 2011). As a nondestructive method, micro‐CT has found extensive application in bone research (Beaucage et al, 2016; Dobrzyński et al, 2018; Linden et al, 2006; Norman et al, 2018; Rutty et al, 2013). Contrary to the classical histological techniques based on microscopic two‐dimensional (2D) evaluation of the cross‐sections, micro‐CT allows evaluation of the bone structure, taking into consideration its 3D structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%