2012
DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrs110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microdosimetric calculation of relative biological effectiveness for design of therapeutic proton beams 

Abstract: The authors attempt to establish the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) calculation for designing therapeutic proton beams on the basis of microdosimetry. The tissue-equivalent proportional counter (TEPC) was used to measure microdosimetric lineal energy spectra for proton beams at various depths in a water phantom. An RBE-weighted absorbed dose is defined as an absorbed dose multiplied by an RBE for cell death of human salivary gland (HSG) tumor cells in this study. The RBE values were calculated by a mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
99
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
8
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These few high lineal energy events can significantly change the values downstream of the BP and can lead to substantial yD¯ uncertainties, which has been noted in Ref. using TEPC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These few high lineal energy events can significantly change the values downstream of the BP and can lead to substantial yD¯ uncertainties, which has been noted in Ref. using TEPC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This RBE value was slightly less than 1 because the dose‐mean lineal energy used for α simulation according to the MKM [Eq. ] for protons at those depths is less than 4.3 keV/μm corresponding to the X‐ray radiation reference used for the RBE derivation [Eq. ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mixed absorbed dose, D m (x), and mixed y ⁄ value, y ⁄ m (x), at the depth of x in the SOBP beam were calculated from the original dose distribution of the mono-energetic beam by the following mixing calculation [13]:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%