Micronekton distribution in the southwest Pacific (New Caledonia) inferred from shipboard-ADCP backscatter data

Abstract

Acoustic data are invaluable information sources for characterizing the distribution and abundance of midtrophic-level organisms (micronekton). These organisms play a pivotal role in the ecosystem as prey of top predators and as predators of low-trophic-level organisms. Although shipboard-ADCP (acoustic Doppler current profiler) acoustic backscatter signal intensity cannot provide an absolute biomass estimate, it may be a useful proxy to investigate variability in the distribution and relative density of micronekton. This study used acoustic recordings data spread across 19 years (1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017) from 54 ADCP cruises in New Caledonia's subtropical EEZ (exclusive economic zone) to assess seasonal and interannual variabilities and spatial distribution of micronekton. The dataset was composed of two different ADCPs: 150 kHz for the first period, followed by 75 kHz for more recent years. We examined the 20-120 m averaged scattering layer. Using the few cruises with concurrent EK60 measurements, we proposed that the backscatter from the ADCPs and 70 kHz EK60 were sufficiently closely linked to allow the use of the backscatter signal from the ADCPs in a combined dataset over the full time series. We then designed a GAMM (generalized additive mixed model) model that takes into account the two ADCP devices as well as temporal variability. After accounting for the effect of the devices, we showed that the acoustic signal was mainly driven by diel vertical migration, season, year, and ENSO (El Niño-Southern Oscillation). In a second step, a consensus model between two statistical approaches (GAMM and SVM) (support vector machine) was constructed, linking the nighttime 20-120 m backscatter to the oceanographic and geographic environment. This model showed that sea surface temperature was the main factor driving backscatter variability in the EEZ, with intensified backscatter during the austral summer (December to May) in the northern part of the EEZ. We showed that acoustic density differed significantly, spatially and temporally from micronekton biomass predicted for the same period by the SEAPODYM-MTL (mid-trophic level) ecosystem model. The seasonal cycle given by ADCP data lagged behind the SEAPODYM-MTL Please note that this is an author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available on the publisher Web site.seasonal cycle by around three months. Reasons to explain these differences and further needs in observation and modeling were explored in the discussion. In addition to providing new insights for micronekton dynamics in this EEZ (i.e., the science needed for ecosystem-based fisheries management), the data should help improve our ability to model this key trophic component. Highlights► 20 years of ADCP acoustic data give insights on spatiotemporal micronekton dynamics. ► Sea-surface temperature is the main factor driving the backsca...

Both Dissolved Oxygen and Chlorophyll Explain the Large-Scale Longitudinal Variation of Deep Scattering Layers in the Tropical Pacific Ocean

“…The raw acoustic data were not calibrated or compared with other calibrated equipment. However, the data from ship-board acoustic Doppler current profiler (SADCP) are considered suitable for evaluating the relative biomass of mesopelagic community and identifying the vertical distribution of DSLs in many studies (Irigoien et al, 2014;Davison et al, 2015;Bianchi and Mislan, 2016;Receveur et al, 2020a). Midday and midnight were defined as the periods of 10:00-14:00 and 20:00-02:00, respectively.…”

“…Mesopelagic organisms are one of the largest groups in the marine biome. They include small fishes, crustaceans, cephalopods, and gelatinous organisms (Salvanes and Kristoffersen, 2001;Receveur et al, 2020a). Micronekton, organisms with a length in the range of 2-20 cm, have a stronger ability to migrate and wider migration range than zooplankton.…”

Biogeography of Micronekton Assemblages in the Natural Park of the Coral Sea

“…We used the Bayesian information criteria (BIC) (Raftery, 1995;Hui et al, 2015) and our personal knowledge of the region based on acoustics data analyses (Receveur et al, 2019(Receveur et al, , 2020 to choose the appropriate number of RCPs.…”

“…Two previous studies analyzed the acoustic data from the same Nectalis surveys to link the mean 20-120 m acoustic echo-intensity and the 0-600 m vertical acoustic profiles to environmental conditions (Receveur et al, 2019(Receveur et al, , 2020. They proposed a bioregionalization of the New Caledonia EEZ based on the micronekton vertical distribution and identified three homogenous regions during the day: (i) north of 21 • S with a weak deep scattering layer (DSL) and a weak shallow scattering layer (SSL); (ii) south of 21 • S and west of 165 • E (intense SSL at 80 m and very intense SSL at 30 m); and (iii) south of 21 • S and east of 165 • E (intense SSL and very intense DSL at 550 m).…”

Detection method for diel vertical migration pattern using 2D cross‐correlation with ADCP backscatter time‐series data

“…To study a wide range of marine ecosystems, DVM phenomena are being tracked globally. It has been possible to increase the number of ADCP moorings and to accumulate data over long periods (Bianchi et al, 2013; Bianchi & Mislan, 2016; Cisewski et al, 2021; Guerra et al, 2019; Receveur et al, 2020). However, since we are limited to manually defining the characteristics of global ecosystems one by one, it is necessary to quantitatively extract and compare the major parameters of different ecosystems.…”