2014
DOI: 10.1111/his.12580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microscopic extraovarian sex cord proliferations: an undescribed phenomenon

Abstract: The pathogenesis of these microscopic extraovarian sex cord proliferations is unknown, but they may represent non-neoplastic proliferations of embryonic remnants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
23
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…( Griffith and Carcangiu, 1991 ; Baron et al, 1998 ) A small case series described two incidentally noted specimens which closely mimicked SCTAT vs adult type granulosa cell tumor(AGCT) within the fimbriae of the fallopian tube. ( McCluggage et al, 2015 ) In contrast to our case, the described specimens in the fallopian tubes consisted of microscopic submillimeter nests of cells, and one of the cases even noted a nest within the ovarian parenchyma, suggesting actual ovarian origin. ( McCluggage et al, 2015 )…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…( Griffith and Carcangiu, 1991 ; Baron et al, 1998 ) A small case series described two incidentally noted specimens which closely mimicked SCTAT vs adult type granulosa cell tumor(AGCT) within the fimbriae of the fallopian tube. ( McCluggage et al, 2015 ) In contrast to our case, the described specimens in the fallopian tubes consisted of microscopic submillimeter nests of cells, and one of the cases even noted a nest within the ovarian parenchyma, suggesting actual ovarian origin. ( McCluggage et al, 2015 )…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…However, the nuclear characteristics of these sex cord proliferations are morphologically distinct to carcinoid tumors and they have a different immunophenotype being positive with sex cord markers inhibin and calretinin (8). In the context of a patient with HBOC (case 2), including those with a BRCA germline mutation, the differential diagnosis might include serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) or high-grade serous carcinoma arising in the fallopian tube or metastatic breast carcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,22 In other ovarian tumors, CD56 has mainly been investigated as a marker for sex-cord differentiation, and was recommended as a sensitive and diagnostically useful marker of sex-cord stromal tumors and extraovarian sexcord proliferations. 11,12 The second relevant group is represented by the well-differentiated primary NE tumors of the ovary associated with teratomas. Some ovarian carcinoid tumors with trabecular growth pattern may show resemblance to Sertoli cell tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%