Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Rockburst and Seismicity in Mines Proceedings 2005
DOI: 10.36487/acg_repo/574_65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microseismic Monitoring of Open Pit Slopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the time window considered, 1,161 events were totally located ( Figure 5). Of those, approximately 5% were recorded below the lowest part of the current pit (880RL) and they were most likely the result of stress changes related to the removal of broken rock after blasting and excavation (Lynch et al 2005). The analysis of the microseismic data revealed a strong relationship between the temporal and spatial style of activity for different areas of the slope, in the response to the triggering input (rainfall events), (Salvoni & Dight 2016).…”
Section: Group Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the time window considered, 1,161 events were totally located ( Figure 5). Of those, approximately 5% were recorded below the lowest part of the current pit (880RL) and they were most likely the result of stress changes related to the removal of broken rock after blasting and excavation (Lynch et al 2005). The analysis of the microseismic data revealed a strong relationship between the temporal and spatial style of activity for different areas of the slope, in the response to the triggering input (rainfall events), (Salvoni & Dight 2016).…”
Section: Group Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The installation and use of a microseismic monitoring system in open pit mines for slope monitoring is not a common practice. Several previous studies (Hudyma et al 2003;Lynch et al 2005;Wesseloo & Sweby 2008;Kagan et al 2013;Vinoth & Kumar 2014) discuss details of their seismic system, however, do not give much detail about the design of such a system from scratch. This section will focus on the design methodology for a microseismic system for open pit slope monitoring.…”
Section: Guideline For Microseismic Monitoring In Open Pit Minesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…size, density, and concentration of the microfractures, the development trend of the macrofractures may be deduced and the potential risk of the dam can be forecasted [3]. In the past two decades, as a three-dimensional, realtime monitoring technique, the MS monitoring technique has been widely applied to assess engineering hazards that involve rock slopes [3][4][5], deep mining [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], tunnels [14][15][16], underground powerhouse caverns [17,18], oil and gas storage [19,20], and nuclear waste disposal [21,22]. For example, Xu et al [3] established a dynamic relationship between geological structures and the spatial distribution of MS events and assessed the stability of a high rock slope based on MS activities.…”
Section: Zeuzier Arch Dam In Switzerlandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has wide engineering applications in South Africa, Canada, Japan, Australia, and America. Some achievements have been obtained in rock slopes [9][10][11], underground mining [8,[12][13][14], tunnels [15,16], oil and gas exploration and development [17], and electricity generation by hot dry rock [18], and so forth. Dam concrete is brittle and the apparent displacement is usually small when a microfracture occurs internally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%