Microspheres and Microcapsules in Biotechnology 2013
DOI: 10.1201/b14540-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microspheres for Enzyme Immobilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
(93 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microcarriers are typically 100–450 µm in diameter and offers very large surface area per unit culture volume for cell attachment . However, the size distribution of microcarriers should be narrower because it is important for good mixing in a bioreactor, homogenous suspension of microcarriers, equal distribution of cells between microcarriers so that confluence of cells can be reached at about the same time on each microcarrier, and also for equal sedimentation during scale‐up steps in large‐scale processes . Given these reasons, an optimum balance is often achieved when the size of microcarriers is in the narrow 150–230 µm range, which is similar to many commercial microcarriers such as Cytodex (141–248 µm) and SoloHill (150–210 µm) microcarriers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microcarriers are typically 100–450 µm in diameter and offers very large surface area per unit culture volume for cell attachment . However, the size distribution of microcarriers should be narrower because it is important for good mixing in a bioreactor, homogenous suspension of microcarriers, equal distribution of cells between microcarriers so that confluence of cells can be reached at about the same time on each microcarrier, and also for equal sedimentation during scale‐up steps in large‐scale processes . Given these reasons, an optimum balance is often achieved when the size of microcarriers is in the narrow 150–230 µm range, which is similar to many commercial microcarriers such as Cytodex (141–248 µm) and SoloHill (150–210 µm) microcarriers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of energy released that favors oxygen degradation, UV irradiation may caused cleavage on the ester linkage of PCL chain. The cleavage contribute to the addition of the oxygen content on the surface of microcarrier and make it more susceptible for gelatin immobilization [10]. The properties of UV/O 3 treated and gelatin immobilized PCL surface were futher characterized to confirm the presence of the functional group and to ensure gelatin was successfully incorporated on the porous PCL microcarrier surface.…”
Section: A Microcarrier Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both solid-filled and porous microcarriers are used to culture cells (7). Solid-filled microcarriers are suitable for scaling up anchorage-dependent cell cultures but have smaller surface areas than porous microcarriers, exhibit higher shear stress, and can form aggregates (17). Porous microcarriers, on the other hand, have several advantages including their 3D topography with a large surface area allowing the use of fewer microcarriers and therefore, protecting cells from shear stress and damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Porous microcarriers, on the other hand, have several advantages including their 3D topography with a large surface area allowing the use of fewer microcarriers and therefore, protecting cells from shear stress and damage. This also allows the use of higher stirring speeds (17,18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation