2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(01)01061-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructural characterisation of five simulated archaeological copper alloys using light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis and secondary ion mass spectrometry

Abstract: This paper describes the microstructural characterisation of five simulated archaeological copper alloys, produced by modern powder technology. The chemical composition of the examined bronzes covers the major families of archaeological bronzes from antiquity until the Roman period. Light microscopy (LM), energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis (EDX), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) as well as two-and three-dimensional secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) have been used to describe the main properties of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, our analyses of BCR 691 Alloy C, arsenical copper with certified 4.6 wt% As, differed more than 40 percent relative to the certified value, typically reporting between 6.1 and 7.1 percent As. However, these alloys were developed for use with XRF analysis and not for microbeam analysis, and Constantinides et al (2001) reported major chemical heterogeneities for this set of alloys, including the presence of numerous sulphide and oxide inclusions in the arsenical copper alloy. Future work will focus on the reliable quantitative analysis of arsenical copper prills using microbeam analysis; for the time being we use the arsenic values of our analyses as reported by the SEMeEDS software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, our analyses of BCR 691 Alloy C, arsenical copper with certified 4.6 wt% As, differed more than 40 percent relative to the certified value, typically reporting between 6.1 and 7.1 percent As. However, these alloys were developed for use with XRF analysis and not for microbeam analysis, and Constantinides et al (2001) reported major chemical heterogeneities for this set of alloys, including the presence of numerous sulphide and oxide inclusions in the arsenical copper alloy. Future work will focus on the reliable quantitative analysis of arsenical copper prills using microbeam analysis; for the time being we use the arsenic values of our analyses as reported by the SEMeEDS software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the area of art and archaeometry, SIMS has been applied successfully to a wide range of materials, including pigments [2,3], glasses [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], metal alloys and tarnishes [14][15][16][17], and human remains such as teeth [18]. Here we describe in more detail the use of both dynamic and static SIMS for some selected applications.…”
Section: Selected Applications In Cultural Heritage Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SIMS has been used to examine these samples previously [30]. In this experiment, a sample was polished and exposed to air to oxidise overnight.…”
Section: Ultra Low Energy Simsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discussed inorganic species were identified in wall [9, 40, 83, 89 -92, 94], paper [9,82,85,87,93,95], canvas [32,84,88,96,97], and sculpture [84,98,99] paintings, as well as in ceramic glazes [100 -102], jewelry products [103], laboratory prepared painting layers [17], and simulated archaeological copper alloys [104]. As was mentioned above, the identification is performed mainly by use of spectral methods, which allow non-destructive analysis of very small spots from the object.…”
Section: Inorganic Pigmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%