Microstructure and mechanical properties of a polyethylene/polydimethylsiloxane composite prepared using supercritical carbon dioxide

Abstract

A polymer composite of polyethylene (PE) and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) was prepared using supercritical carbon dioxide despite the two polymers usually being immiscible and possessing a phase‐separated morphology. This article reports in detail the preparation, microstructure, crystallinity, and mechanical properties of the resulting PE/PDMS composite. The formation mechanism of the PE/PDMS composite consisted of supercritical impregnation of an octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4) monomer and an initiator into a PE substrate followed by in situ polymerization within the substrate. Differential scanning calorimetry, wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction, and small‐angle X‐ray scattering measurements showed that PE and PDMS were blended at the nanometer level. The PDMS generated in the amorphous region of PE did not affect its crystallinity. Dynamic viscoelastic analyses and tensile tests were used to measure the mechanical properties of the composites including storage and Young's modulus, fracture stress, and strain. These properties were found to depend on the composition of the composite. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013

Crosslinking effect on polydimethylsiloxane elastic modulus measured by custom‐built compression instrument

“…Another advanced approach utilizes the buckling of a polystyrene thin film sensor, which is attached to a polymer surface with an elastic modulus below 10 MPa . Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) is also a viable alternative to test the complex modulus of the PDMS network, however it was not utilized in this study, which introduces a simpler method based on the unconfined macroscopic compression test. Here, a custom‐built macroscopic compression instrument was used for reliable and repeatable measurements of the PDMS network stiffness with varied degrees of crosslinking.…”

Nanoindentation study of polydimethylsiloxane elastic modulus using Berkovich and flat punch tips

“…Utilizing a flat punch tip geometry, for which the contact area stays constant, is one of the alternatives. Conventional dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) testing can be a viable method to test the complex PDMS modulus . In addition to the quasi‐static indentation, dynamic nanoindentation testing was also employed here.…”