2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr.2014.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructure turbulence and diffusivity parameterization in the tropical and subtropical Atlantic, Pacific and Indian Oceans during the Malaspina 2010 expedition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
4
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we have calculated N 2 between the 70% PAR (3 m) and 150 m. Furthermore, we have also calculated the gradients of potential temperature and salinity (D θ and D S ) over the upper 150 m, which were obtained as the difference between the potential temperature or salinity at 70% PAR (about 3 m) and 150 m divided by the difference in depth (147 m). The mixed layer depth (MLD) was calculated as the depth where potential density exceeded the value at 3 m by 0.1 kg m −3 (Fernández‐Castro et al ). Daily, weekly and monthly short wave (wavelength range, 175–3850 nm) solar radiation data (SWR, in MJ m −2 d −1 ) were obtained from the National Centres for Environmental Predictions NCEP/DOE 2 reanalysis database provided by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSD, Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A., (http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/) and interpolated for each station.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we have calculated N 2 between the 70% PAR (3 m) and 150 m. Furthermore, we have also calculated the gradients of potential temperature and salinity (D θ and D S ) over the upper 150 m, which were obtained as the difference between the potential temperature or salinity at 70% PAR (about 3 m) and 150 m divided by the difference in depth (147 m). The mixed layer depth (MLD) was calculated as the depth where potential density exceeded the value at 3 m by 0.1 kg m −3 (Fernández‐Castro et al ). Daily, weekly and monthly short wave (wavelength range, 175–3850 nm) solar radiation data (SWR, in MJ m −2 d −1 ) were obtained from the National Centres for Environmental Predictions NCEP/DOE 2 reanalysis database provided by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSD, Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A., (http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/) and interpolated for each station.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These numbers represent the first estimate of the contribution of both processes in a coastal upwelling system. Few studies have simultaneously quantified BNF and nitrate diffusion (Mouriño-Carballido et al, 2011;Painter et al, 2013;Fernández-Castro et al, 2015), mainly due to the methodological difficulties to estimate vertical mixing (Kz) in the field, which has frequently motivated the use of constant values of Kz , and empirical parameterizations (Planas et al, 1999;Fernández-Castro et al, 2014). Capone et al (2005) estimated in the tropical North Atlantic that BNF could equal or even exceed nitrate vertical diffusion into the euphotic zone.…”
Section: Magnitude and Biogeochemical Relevance Of Bnfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to significant turbulence generation close to the ship, only the data below 5 m were considered reliable. Data processing and calculation of dissipation rates of turbulent kinetic energy (ε) was carried out with the commercial software MSSpro as described in detail in Fernández-Castro et al (2014). The squared Brunt Väisälä frequency (N 2 ), a proxy for water column stratification, was computed from the CTD profiles according to the equation:…”
Section: Dissipation Rates Of Turbulent Kinetic Energy and Estimates mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wind mixing, surface heat loss to the atmosphere, wave-generated mixing, shears associated with nearinertial oscillations, and other processes cause turbulence values in the surface ''mixed layer'' to be several decades larger than found deeper in the interior thermocline [Fernandez-Castro et al, 2014]. Diffusive transport through the stratified water column below the base of the mixed layer is typically expressed as a downgradient flux that is proportional to the property gradient, with the proportionality factor referred to as the ''diffusion coefficient'' or ''eddy diffusivity,'' hereinafter referred to simply as ''diffusivity.''…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%