1965
DOI: 10.1109/t-ed.1965.15552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwave amplification in a bulk semiconductor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1966
1966
1971
1971

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most satisfactory argument is that advanced by McCumber and Chynoweth, although the actual value of the minimum no I product may be larger than the crude estimates made above as a result of the stabilizing effect of diffusion and energy transport processes (McCumber and Chynoweth 1966). The observed values of the minimum no I product for instability vary from 10l1 cm-2 (Day 1966) to 5 x 1011 cm-2 (Thim and Barber 1966).…”
Section: W = K Z ' -I ( ~ J -~+ D K ~)mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most satisfactory argument is that advanced by McCumber and Chynoweth, although the actual value of the minimum no I product may be larger than the crude estimates made above as a result of the stabilizing effect of diffusion and energy transport processes (McCumber and Chynoweth 1966). The observed values of the minimum no I product for instability vary from 10l1 cm-2 (Day 1966) to 5 x 1011 cm-2 (Thim and Barber 1966).…”
Section: W = K Z ' -I ( ~ J -~+ D K ~)mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…T h e behaviour at low frequencies is similar to that found from equation (4.13), but the negative resistance disappears at high frequencies after a few cycles of oscillation. The negative resistance occurs in the right frequency range to account for the microwave amplification first observed in high resistivity gallium arsenide by Thim et al (1965) but the calculated impedance does not give the correct values of the gain or the oscillation threshold. The calculations of Mahrous and Robson (1966) and of were carried out by explicit evaluation of the integrals (4.11) and (4.12) for simple three-line approximations to the velocity-field characteristic.…”
Section: W = K Z ' -I ( ~ J -~+ D K ~)mentioning
confidence: 96%