2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mid-level image representations for real-time heart view plane classification of echocardiograms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method has an average classification accuracy of 77.1% for the eight main sections. Penatti et al [ 18 ] used SVM and backpropagation neural networks to classify echocardiograms based on the gray histogram and statistical features such as entropy, kurtosis, skewness, mean value, and standard deviation, and the average classification accuracy rate was 90%. Khamis et al [ 19 ] proposed the use of discriminative learning dictionaries and spatiotemporal feature extraction and supervised dictionary learning methods to classify the three apical sections (apical two-chamber, apical four-chamber, and apical three-chamber) of echocardiography, and the average classification accuracy is 95%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has an average classification accuracy of 77.1% for the eight main sections. Penatti et al [ 18 ] used SVM and backpropagation neural networks to classify echocardiograms based on the gray histogram and statistical features such as entropy, kurtosis, skewness, mean value, and standard deviation, and the average classification accuracy rate was 90%. Khamis et al [ 19 ] proposed the use of discriminative learning dictionaries and spatiotemporal feature extraction and supervised dictionary learning methods to classify the three apical sections (apical two-chamber, apical four-chamber, and apical three-chamber) of echocardiography, and the average classification accuracy is 95%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related work and state of the art Penatti et al (2015) reviewed cardiac view classification for TTE up to 2013. Most studies consider a selection of three or four of the most common cardiac views: apical two chamber (A2C), apical fourchamber (A4C) and apical long-axis (ALAX), as well as the parasternal long-axis (PLAX) and parasternal short-axis (PSAX).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, there has been a wide interest in DL-based approaches for classifying the view of the heart. Penatti et al [ 46 ] proposed a bag of visual words (BOVW) representation for the classification of four cardiac view planes. A BOVW for an image represents an image as a set of features which consists of keypoints and descriptors.…”
Section: Advanced Us Imaging In Cardiology and DL Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%