Milk Yield Response of Bypass Protein on Smallholder Dairy Animals

Osti, N. P.; Jha, Pradeep Kumar; Mandal, Prabhat Kumar; Shah, B.; Shrestha, Bhola Shankar; Upreti, Chet R.; Joshi, Bhoj Raj; Tiwari, Madhu

doi:10.6000/1927-520x.2017.06.03.4

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The present results corresponded with the findings of several authors (Abdel-Ghani et al, 2011;Osti et al, 2013;Kumar et al, 2015) they observed significant effects of protein protection meal on average body weight gain in studies conducted on growing lambs and cattle. Furthermore, Chunjian and Limin (2016) indicated that the using of heat protected soybean meal resulted in significant improve in growth rate.…”

Section: -Growth Performancesupporting

confidence: 93%

Effect of Feeding Different Levels from Heat Protected Soybean Meal Protein in Diets of Growing Rahmani Lambs on Digestibility Coefficients, Feeding Values and Growth Performance

El-Ayek

El-Moghazy

Areda

2019

Journal of Animal and Poultry Production

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fifteen weaning Rahmani lambs with an average live body weight 19±0.5 kg and 4 months age were randomly assigned into three groups (each of 5 lambs) to study the effect of heat protected soybean meal protein diets at 145°C in a forced air oven for 4 hrs on nutrients digestibility as well as feeding values and their reflection on growth performance of growing lambs. Animals were fed for 120 days feeding period on the same three experimental diets. Control fed diet containing soybean meal (15%) without treatment as a consists of CFM + clover hay. The T1 fed diet containing (50% soybean meal protected + 50% soybean meal unprotected) as consists of CFM + clover hay. The T2 fed diet containing 100% soybean meal protected as consists of CFM + clover hay animal were fed in groups. Digestibility coefficients were determined using acid insoluble ash (AIA%) as natural marker. The obtained results indicated that digestibility coefficients of DM, OM, CP, EE and NFE for lambs fed heat protected soybean meal protein were higher than those fed untreated diet. The improvements in nutrients digestibility reflected better feeding values in terms of TDN and DCP% for both diets contained treated protein than untreated one. Total dry matter intake varied between 1475.85 to 1518.28, 86.02 to 93.66 and 3.30 to 3.70 expressed as g/h/day, Kg W0.75 and %BW, respectively. In average, it is clearly appears that the highest daily weight gain was showed in T2 followed by T1 and control diets (0.211±0.013, 0.172±0.009 and 0.159±0.015Kg, respectively). The changes in body weights were in ascending order with increasing the level of protected soybean meal protein in animal diets. Net revenue was pronouncedly higher in diet that included heat protected soybean meal protein (853.634 and 1129.2 for T1 and T2, respectively) while it was 761.400L.E in control diet. From the obtained results, this study recommends the use of heat treatment as a protection method for SBM protein diets in growing lambs at 100% protected soybean meal protein.

show abstract

Section: -Growth Performancesupporting

confidence: 93%

Effect of Feeding Different Levels from Heat Protected Soybean Meal Protein in Diets of Growing Rahmani Lambs on Digestibility Coefficients, Feeding Values and Growth Performance

El-Ayek

El-Moghazy

Areda

2019

Journal of Animal and Poultry Production

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For better utilization of good quality protein sources, there should be alteration of protein where rumen bacteria and protozoa may not attack on protein sources and make available in small intestine in other word the amount of ammonia produced in the rumen *Address correspondence to this author at the National Animal Science Research Institute, Khumaltar Lalitpur Nepal; Tel: +977-15523039/+977-9803487112; E-mail: ostinp02@gmail.com from various protein sources is inversely correlated with the N 2 retention. Therefore, high milk yielding dairy animal need good quality feeding resources [4] which are not likely to degrade in the rumen and directly go to abomasums [5] and absorb in small intestine (bypass). In these two (on-station and on-farm) trails objectives were how much soybean meals to supply in day to lactating dairy animals and effects on small holder dairy animals on milk yield were carried out.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Milk Yield Response of Bypass Protein on Smallholder Dairy Animals

Osti¹,

Jha²,

Mandal³

et al. 2018

J Buf Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Protein need for small holder dairy animals is very limited. Considering this problem one on-station and one on-farm trails were conducted in 2013 and 2014 in Nepal respectively. In on-station trial (2013) 15 milking buffaloes were randomly assigned to 5 dietary treatments (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 kg de-oiled soybean meals/day/buffalo) and in on-farm trial (2014), 20 milking buffaloes were assigned to 0.5 kg de-oiled soybean meal/day/buffalo for two months dry period. From on-station trial, significantly higher (42 %) milk production was observed from 0.5 kg and 1 kg de-oiled soybean meal/day/buffalo feeding groups. From the on-farm trials in village dairy buffaloes 20 percent milk production increment was observed compared with the normal farmer's feeding practices (de-oiled soybean meals unfed condition). It was concluded that, in addition to normal diet, 0.5 to 1 kg de-oiled soybean meal (depending up on the body weight of animal and feeding situation) per day feeding as bypass protein sources could be beneficial during dry period where green fodder is scarce to maintain milk production from dairy animals.

show abstract

“…In buffalo farm, cost on grass and fodder, labour cost and cost of feed, medicines and additives significantly affect the productivity of buffalo at 5% level of probability. Osti et. al, (2013) also found that milk production was less (8 kg/day/head) prior to protein based feeding, while higher during protein based feeding (10.0 kg/animal/day) was provided.…”

Section: Cost Return and Profitabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Relative Cost, Profitability and Efficiency among Different Types of Dairy Farms at Bharatpur, Chitwan, Nepal

Dhakal

2022

Agric. Dev. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dairy sector is gradually commercializing and modernizing with the use of improved breeds, processed feeds, cultivated grass, fodders, medicines and additives in Nepal. In this context, this study was designed to evaluate the relative cost, return, resource use efficiency, return to scale and profitability of milk production in different type of dairy farms. Primary data were collected through face-to-face interview using semi-structured interview schedule from a sample of 240 dairy farms selected from simple random sampling technique in 8 wards of Bharatpur Metropolitan City, Chitwan. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, cost and profit analysis, linear production function and Cobb-Douglas function. It was found that pure buffalo farms were facing negative profit margin against the profit of Rs. 32565 and Rs. 106627 at cow and mix system of dairy farming, respectively. Average variable cost of per liter milk production was Rs. 93.70, Rs. 54.80 and Rs. 44.73 for buffalo, cow and mix farms, respectively with benefit-cost ratio of 0.99, 1.44 and 1.62 for respective categories of the farms. Green grass, dry fodder, labour, feed, medicines and additives were significantly contributing to milk production in buffalo and cow farms. But, only grass, fodder and labour were contributing to milk production in mix dairy farms. All categories of farms were suffering from decreasing return to scale but they were still profitable over variable cost. Labour was the most contributing factor in all three categories of farms and thus dairy farming seems potential to create productive employment. This is concluded that dairy farming system can be promoted profitably by enhancing the level of use of labour, grass, fodder, medicines and additives.

show abstract

Milk Yield Response of Bypass Protein on Smallholder Dairy Animals

Cited by 4 publications

References 1 publication

Effect of Feeding Different Levels from Heat Protected Soybean Meal Protein in Diets of Growing Rahmani Lambs on Digestibility Coefficients, Feeding Values and Growth Performance

Effect of Feeding Different Levels from Heat Protected Soybean Meal Protein in Diets of Growing Rahmani Lambs on Digestibility Coefficients, Feeding Values and Growth Performance

Milk Yield Response of Bypass Protein on Smallholder Dairy Animals

Relative Cost, Profitability and Efficiency among Different Types of Dairy Farms at Bharatpur, Chitwan, Nepal

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About