2014 10th International Conference on Communications (COMM) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iccomm.2014.6866699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Miller code usage in Visible Light Communications under the PHY I layer of the IEEE 802.15.7 standard

Abstract: This paper approaches the issues concerning the usage of the delay modulation as a coding technique used for outdoor Visible Light Communications (VLC) under PHY I layer of the IEEE 802.15.7 standard. We perform a comparative analysis between the Manchester code, as a traditional code, specified by the upper mentioned standard and the Miller code as a possible candidate for outdoor MIMO applications. Simulation and experimental results are provided, offering an overview over the multi-channel, flickering and B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, in addition, the Miller code is also bandwidth efficient, offering the premises for MIMO applications. Furthermore, as detailed in [25], the flickering effect introduced by the Miller code is rather limited, making it safe to be used in outdoor applications. Both codes are used in onoff keying (OOK) configuration and are well suited for short or medium simplex communications where the SNR does not need improvements based on more complex frequency or phase modulation techniques.…”
Section: B Discussion About the Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, in addition, the Miller code is also bandwidth efficient, offering the premises for MIMO applications. Furthermore, as detailed in [25], the flickering effect introduced by the Miller code is rather limited, making it safe to be used in outdoor applications. Both codes are used in onoff keying (OOK) configuration and are well suited for short or medium simplex communications where the SNR does not need improvements based on more complex frequency or phase modulation techniques.…”
Section: B Discussion About the Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Manchester code, there are only two symbols (the positive edge and the negative edge) leading to only two combinations of widths: either one elementary bit width or two bit widths. For the Miller code, its memory effect leads to three possible combinations: either one elementary width, or one and a half or two widths [25]. These properties are exploited and detailed in the section III.…”
Section: B Discussion About the Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microcontroller processes the data to send, transforms it into a binary string, encodes the data, creates the data frame and modulates it. In this case, the VLC prototype is able to work with Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS) and On-Off-Keying (OOK) modulations, Sequence Inverse Keying (SIK) [ 21 ], Manchester and Miller [ 65 ] coding techniques and variable data rates between 3 and 200 kb/s. The data frame begins with a synchronization header that informs the VLC receiver that a new data frame will begin, continues with a physical header that provides the VLC receiver with information concerning the selected modulation, coding technique, data rate, and message length, and ends-up with a variable length data field.…”
Section: Description Of the Vehicle-to-vehicle Visible Light Communications Prototypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the down-side, the Manchester code has the disadvantage of larger bandwidth requirements as compared to other common codes. Accordingly, in addition to the classical Manchester code, the performances of the Miller code [70,71] are also investigated. The Miller code has rather similar advantages as the Manchester code, but it is also bandwidth-efficient.…”
Section: Modulation and Coding Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%