2005
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2005.850642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MIM Capacitor Integration for Mixed-Signal/RF Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with other integrated capacitor technologies, such as the polysilicon/silicon-based trench capacitors [7], [8] and crown-shaped capacitors [9], or the native intrametal lateral flux capacitors [10], [11] (also known as metal-oxide-metal capacitors), MIM capacitors offer lower resistive loss, lower substrate coupling noise, no charge depletion-induced voltage dependence, higher self resonance, and moderately high capacitance density [2]. However, as the capacitance density requirements stated in the latest 2011 International Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) [12] continue to increase, further thinning of the dielectric layer tends to lead to excessive leakage currents and dielectric loss, thus either opting for high-k dielectric materials [13]- [16] or migrating to multilayer stacked structures [2] cannot be avoided. Yet, high-k dielectrics tend to exhibit permittivity with higher bias voltage dependence, whereas multilayer stacking will inevitably increase the complexity and cost of the fabrication due to the repetitive photolithography and etching steps, resulting in a tradeoff between capacitance density, performance, and low-cost manufacturing.…”
Section: Increased Multilayer Fabrication and Rfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with other integrated capacitor technologies, such as the polysilicon/silicon-based trench capacitors [7], [8] and crown-shaped capacitors [9], or the native intrametal lateral flux capacitors [10], [11] (also known as metal-oxide-metal capacitors), MIM capacitors offer lower resistive loss, lower substrate coupling noise, no charge depletion-induced voltage dependence, higher self resonance, and moderately high capacitance density [2]. However, as the capacitance density requirements stated in the latest 2011 International Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) [12] continue to increase, further thinning of the dielectric layer tends to lead to excessive leakage currents and dielectric loss, thus either opting for high-k dielectric materials [13]- [16] or migrating to multilayer stacked structures [2] cannot be avoided. Yet, high-k dielectrics tend to exhibit permittivity with higher bias voltage dependence, whereas multilayer stacking will inevitably increase the complexity and cost of the fabrication due to the repetitive photolithography and etching steps, resulting in a tradeoff between capacitance density, performance, and low-cost manufacturing.…”
Section: Increased Multilayer Fabrication and Rfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide effective decoupling above several hundreds of MHz, the total capacitance of the on-chip capacitors must be increased without increasing the chip area. Capacitors suitable for implementing such a decoupling solution on chips are metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) capacitors, metal-insulator-metal (MIM) capacitors, and deep trench (DT) capacitors [1][2][3]. MOS capacitors have been the most popular choice for the decoupling solution.…”
Section: Decoupling Capacitor Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As silicon technology continues to scale, the deep-trench capacitors with high capacitance densities can be developed. For example, 65 nm CMOS technology can provide up to 200 nF/ mm 2 . DT capacitors that are realized on silicon chips as MOS decoupling capacitors offer better capacitance density, while the leakage current is much lower compared to MOS decoupling capacitors.…”
Section: Deep Trench Capacitormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M ETAL-INSULATOR-METAL (MIM) capacitors have been widely used for digital, analog, mixed signal, and RF circuits [1], [2]. For device scaling, their capacitance density should be increased more than 10-15 fF/µm 2 with a tight requirement for leakage current (< 10 −8 A/cm 2 ) [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%