2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.92.125119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally entangled typical thermal states versus matrix product purifications for the simulation of equilibrium states and time evolution

Abstract: For the simulation of equilibrium states and finite-temperature response functions of stronglycorrelated quantum many-body systems, we compare the efficiencies of two different approaches in the framework of the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG). The first is based on matrix product purifications. The second, more recent one, is based on so-called minimally entangled typical thermal states (METTS). For the latter, we highlight the interplay of statistical and DMRG truncation errors, discuss the use o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two possible choices exist within the MPS framework: minimally entangled typical thermal states [64] and thermofield doublet states [8,65,66]. In the following, we will concentrate on thermofield doublet states or "purifications" of a mixed state; a detailed comparison between both methods can be found in [51]. The purification works by doubling the Hilbert space H → H p ⊗ H a where a denotes the auxiliary or ancilla degrees of freedom.…”
Section: Finite Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two possible choices exist within the MPS framework: minimally entangled typical thermal states [64] and thermofield doublet states [8,65,66]. In the following, we will concentrate on thermofield doublet states or "purifications" of a mixed state; a detailed comparison between both methods can be found in [51]. The purification works by doubling the Hilbert space H → H p ⊗ H a where a denotes the auxiliary or ancilla degrees of freedom.…”
Section: Finite Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the ITensor library for these calculations [71]. To address the challenge of mixed states (finite temperature), many MPS-based methods have been proposed, developed, and compared [72], e.g., the finite-temperature Lanczos method [73], the purification scheme of a pure state in an enlarged Hilbert space [74], and, more recently, the minimally-entangled typically thermal states approach [75,76]. In this paper, we use the purification scheme which introduces an auxiliary Hilbert space Q acting as a thermal bath.…”
Section: Matrix Product Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the trick of Eq. (4), in a generalized form, also works for non-zero temperatures [32][33][34]. Another device to reach longer times, which is by now a standard tool, is to extrapolate the simulation data through linear prediction [35,36].…”
Section: Response Functions For Translation-invariant Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%