2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2012.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum cost attribute reduction in decision-theoretic rough set models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we make a generalization that attributes may have different numbers of levels of granulations. Since various rough set models have been proposed for knowledge reduction and decision rules acquisition in information tables [4,7,[9][10][11]15,21,23,32,42,45,49] , optimal scale selection of the general multi-scale information systems is mainly studied in this paper. Besides, we only discuss consistent decision tables since an inconsistent decision table can be transformed into a consistent one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we make a generalization that attributes may have different numbers of levels of granulations. Since various rough set models have been proposed for knowledge reduction and decision rules acquisition in information tables [4,7,[9][10][11]15,21,23,32,42,45,49] , optimal scale selection of the general multi-scale information systems is mainly studied in this paper. Besides, we only discuss consistent decision tables since an inconsistent decision table can be transformed into a consistent one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through the three decades of the development, rough set has been demonstrated to be useful in knowledge acquisition 5,10 , pattern recognition 3,7,23 , machine learning 6,8,9,11,26 , decision support 21,44,46,57 and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(DTRS) [2,7,8,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]26,27,[32][33][34][35][36]38] extended RST by considering probabilistic information of objects into a set of positive, negative or boundary regions, by introducing a pair of thresholds (a, b). When proper thresholds are used, we can derive several existing probabilistic rough set models, such as the variable precision rough set (VPRS) [40,41], the game-theoretic rough set (GTRS) [2,12], and the Bayesian rough set (BRS) [23] from the decision-theoretic rough set model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%