2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.09.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum effective area for high resolution crater counting of martian terrains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
102
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
3
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The age of the kilometer‐sized constructional edifices is difficult to determine as they do not represent sufficiently large areas for the determination of crater size‐frequency distributions (Warner et al, ). To overcome this problem, we determined the crater model ages of one unit with a known relative stratigraphic relation to the edifices, which are superposed on this unit and must therefore be younger.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The age of the kilometer‐sized constructional edifices is difficult to determine as they do not represent sufficiently large areas for the determination of crater size‐frequency distributions (Warner et al, ). To overcome this problem, we determined the crater model ages of one unit with a known relative stratigraphic relation to the edifices, which are superposed on this unit and must therefore be younger.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The units discussed here must have been deposited long ago, when water flowed on the surface of Mars, but the precise timing of this deposition remains unknown. The areal extents of the units are too small for robust determinations of age using conventional crater‐counting methods (Hartmann et al, ; Warner et al, ). Furthermore, differences in the amount of induration in the study area have led to better crater retention in some units that are stratigraphically younger than older adjacent regions (e.g., Figure ), further challenging the utility of crater age‐dating at the scale of this study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we note that the conclusions of Warner et al . [] appreciating the implications for validity consider the model ages over areas <1000 km 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%