2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevfluids.3.074001
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum size for the top jet drop from a bursting bubble

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
81
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
10
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The large difference in r i between the droplets generated in regions I and II is likely associated with the mechanisms by which the droplets are generated. From the LIF movies, it appears that the small bubble popping later in the process (region II) looks at least similar to popping events found in experiments with single small bubbles in quiescent tanks of water (see, e.g., Cipriano & Blanchard, ; Kientzler et al, ; Gañán Calvo, ; Deike et al, ; Brasz et al, ; Spiel, ; ; Resch, ; Resch & Afeti, ) though the large number of bubbles and the decaying underlying turbulent flow seem to complicate the process. However, the larger bubbles from the first plunging event that burst in region I appear to be quite different.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The large difference in r i between the droplets generated in regions I and II is likely associated with the mechanisms by which the droplets are generated. From the LIF movies, it appears that the small bubble popping later in the process (region II) looks at least similar to popping events found in experiments with single small bubbles in quiescent tanks of water (see, e.g., Cipriano & Blanchard, ; Kientzler et al, ; Gañán Calvo, ; Deike et al, ; Brasz et al, ; Spiel, ; ; Resch, ; Resch & Afeti, ) though the large number of bubbles and the decaying underlying turbulent flow seem to complicate the process. However, the larger bubbles from the first plunging event that burst in region I appear to be quite different.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The smallest singular dimple width is here 12 μm which is similar to the 15 μm observed by Thoroddsen et al (2018), who used a liquid which is an order of magnitude more viscous. This suggests that a viscous cutoff is not at play for the much lower viscosity of our PP1 drop (Castrejón-Pita et al 2015;Brasz et al 2018a). We can speculate that cavitation or vortex-shedding instability (Thoraval et al 2012) in the cusp at the base of the jet prevents smaller jet sizes, as we see by the micro-bubbles shed at the base of the jet in figure 5(b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…However, identifying the critical Oh 1 does not resolve the dependency that both the this work, another paper [19] has discussed the minimum size of the drops ejected, which is also contemplated here for completeness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%