2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2009.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum wage restrictions and employee effort in incomplete labor markets: An experimental investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, a recent study by Riley and Rosazza Bondibene () presents firm‐level evidence that both the initial British minimum wage introduction and the subsequent minimum wage increases in the aftermath of the crisis caused productivity to increase. Theoretical reasons for this growth in labor productivity are (Riley and Rosazza Bondibene, ): (1) substitution effects when firms replace labor inputs by capital, (2) firms increasing investments in training (Acemoglu and Pischke, ; Arulampalam et al ., ), (3) efficiency‐enhancing human resource practices (Hirsch et al ., ), (4) higher performance standards of the firm, and (5) increased worker effort in response to receiving higher or fair wages (Akerlof, ; Owens and Kagel, ). As we look at individual engagement as an outcome variable, this mostly identifies effects via the last channel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, a recent study by Riley and Rosazza Bondibene () presents firm‐level evidence that both the initial British minimum wage introduction and the subsequent minimum wage increases in the aftermath of the crisis caused productivity to increase. Theoretical reasons for this growth in labor productivity are (Riley and Rosazza Bondibene, ): (1) substitution effects when firms replace labor inputs by capital, (2) firms increasing investments in training (Acemoglu and Pischke, ; Arulampalam et al ., ), (3) efficiency‐enhancing human resource practices (Hirsch et al ., ), (4) higher performance standards of the firm, and (5) increased worker effort in response to receiving higher or fair wages (Akerlof, ; Owens and Kagel, ). As we look at individual engagement as an outcome variable, this mostly identifies effects via the last channel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) substitution effects when firms replace labor inputs by capital, (2) firms increasing investments in training (Acemoglu and Pischke, 2001;Arulampalam et al, 2004), (3) efficiency-enhancing human resource practices (Hirsch et al, 2015), (4) higher performance standards of the firm, and (5) increased worker effort in response to receiving higher or fair wages (Akerlof, 1984;Owens and Kagel, 2010). As we look at individual engagement as an outcome variable, this mostly identifies effects via the last channel.…”
Section: Effects On Work Engagement and Turnover Intentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect is even stronger if the same wage level chosen for the wage guideline is set as a (binding) "minimum wage." On the impact of minimum wages on effort in gift-exchange games see also Brandts and Charness (2004) and Owens and Kagel (2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owens and Kagel (2010) find in a gift-exchange game that minimum wages lead to 2 Falk and Kosfeld (2006) highlight in another paper that "hidden costs of control" may also play an important role in principal-agent settings. Put differently, revoking the freedom of employees may backfire, i.e., employees exert lower effort when principals specify minimum effort levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%