2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4379(02)00100-x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mining for interactive identification of users’ information needs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Human‐machine interaction (Schumaker, & Chen, ) is another approach to address the feature sparseness of short queries. Liu and Lin () construct and maintain a profile for each information category, and propose an effective method of interacting with the users to map users’ information needs expressed by a short query to suitable categories.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human‐machine interaction (Schumaker, & Chen, ) is another approach to address the feature sparseness of short queries. Liu and Lin () construct and maintain a profile for each information category, and propose an effective method of interacting with the users to map users’ information needs expressed by a short query to suitable categories.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, it requires many interactions between a user and the system to identify the appropriate information category (topic) and hence imposes heavy cognitive load on the user. 25 The information agent approach discussed in this paper tries to deal with a more challenging issue in the sense that an information agent should be able to learn appropriate domain specific knowledge (i.e. the retrieval context) with minimal human intervention.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…COD), which are parts of the semantic contents embedded in documents and categories. There were also studies employing COD recognition to classify queries into most-possible categories [6]. However, the classifiers did not consider DF.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve the mission, previous CODbased classifiers (e.g. [6]) require significant modifications, due to two reasons: (1) previous COD recognition techniques is not suitable for performing DF, since a document may be classified into a category only if its COD matches the category's context at each level of generality (rather than considering the average matching degree at multiple levels, as done by previous COD-based classifiers whose goal was to perform DC by identifying the most possible category for the document), and (2) previous thresholding techniques cannot be suitable for the classifiers to derive COD thresholds, since a category's COD threshold should be tuned by considering both the category and ancestors of the category (rather than considering the category only, as done by previous thresholding techniques).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%