1990
DOI: 10.1080/01434632.1990.9994400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minority language group status: A theoretical conspexus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet since its introduction the combined notions of objective and subjective vitality have remained useful as conceptual tools for discussing a broad range of applied and theoretical issues within the language and ethnicity literature. These notions have been most fruitfully applied to issues related to cross-cultural communication (Bourhis, 1984b;Gudykunst, 1986;Gudykunst & Ting-Toomey, 1990;Sachdev & Bourhis, 1990a;b), language attitudes (Genesee & Bourhis, 1988;Ryan, Giles & Sebastian, 1982), ethnolinguistic behaviours (Giles & Johnson, 1981;Yaeger-Dror, 1988;van den Berg, 1988) as well as language acquisition and bilingualism (Clement, 1980;Giles & Byrne, 1982;Garrett, Giles & Coupland, 1989;Landry & Allard, 1988) and language maintenance and loss (Giles & Johnson, 1987;Giles, Leets & Coupland, 1990). …”
Section: Ethnolinguistic Vitality: Objective and Subjective Parametersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Yet since its introduction the combined notions of objective and subjective vitality have remained useful as conceptual tools for discussing a broad range of applied and theoretical issues within the language and ethnicity literature. These notions have been most fruitfully applied to issues related to cross-cultural communication (Bourhis, 1984b;Gudykunst, 1986;Gudykunst & Ting-Toomey, 1990;Sachdev & Bourhis, 1990a;b), language attitudes (Genesee & Bourhis, 1988;Ryan, Giles & Sebastian, 1982), ethnolinguistic behaviours (Giles & Johnson, 1981;Yaeger-Dror, 1988;van den Berg, 1988) as well as language acquisition and bilingualism (Clement, 1980;Giles & Byrne, 1982;Garrett, Giles & Coupland, 1989;Landry & Allard, 1988) and language maintenance and loss (Giles & Johnson, 1987;Giles, Leets & Coupland, 1990). …”
Section: Ethnolinguistic Vitality: Objective and Subjective Parametersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, it has been applied to issues of cross-cultural communication (Gudykunst and Ting-Toomey 1990), language maintenance (Giles, Leets, and Coupland 1990), second language learning (Clement, Baker, and MacIntyre 2003), acculturation (Bourhis et al 1997) and media studies (Moring and Husband 2007). These applications indicate that the notion of EV has been found useful in explaining phenomena in these studies, but these phenomena can also offer feedback to the EV theory, providing crucial insights into the interrelations between vitality and other factors.…”
Section: Current Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maintenance or loss of member's language/speech style is considered partially or largely dependent on one's ethnic identity (Clachar 1997;Giles, Leets, and Coupland 1990). It has been suggested that if one's ethnic identity is weak, one is more likely to shift to the linguistic behaviour of an out-group, but if it is strong, one is more likely to retain one's in-group language.…”
Section: 'Identity' As a Key Variablementioning
confidence: 99%