2016
DOI: 10.1177/0011000016669233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minority Stress and Bisexual Women’s Disordered Eating

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to explore the link between bisexual women’s experiences of anti-bisexual discrimination and disordered eating, while examining potential mediating variables underlying this link: outness/identity concealment and maladaptive coping (i.e., coping via internalization, detachment, and drug and alcohol use). A total of 353 bisexual women participated in this study. The relationship between outness and disordered eating was not significant. Higher levels of anti-bisexual discrimination… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, the initial hypothesis that the diff erent sexual orientations of the sample would impact diff erently on their levels of internalized homophobia, experiences of victimization and concealment of sexual orientation was refuted. Therefore, the results of the present study do not agree with the majority of the literature, which indicates that bisexual people present higher rates of minority stress, anxiety and depression when compared to gay and lesbian people (Katz- Wise, Mereish, & Woulfe, 2016;Molina et al, 2015;Watson, Velez, Brownfi eld, & Flores, 2016).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…That is, the initial hypothesis that the diff erent sexual orientations of the sample would impact diff erently on their levels of internalized homophobia, experiences of victimization and concealment of sexual orientation was refuted. Therefore, the results of the present study do not agree with the majority of the literature, which indicates that bisexual people present higher rates of minority stress, anxiety and depression when compared to gay and lesbian people (Katz- Wise, Mereish, & Woulfe, 2016;Molina et al, 2015;Watson, Velez, Brownfi eld, & Flores, 2016).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…For bisexual men, distal risk factors for disordered eating behaviors related to sexual orientation included discrimination, concealment of sexual orientation, rumination about discrimination, internalized biphobia, internalized binegativity, gay community identification (for thinner men), and sexual objectification experiences [ 10 , 23 , 26 , 47 , 156 , 163 , 166 ]. Risk factors related to relationship dynamics included lower relationship satisfaction and being single [ 27 , 29 ].…”
Section: Eating Disorders and Disordered Eating Behaviors Within Lgbtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been found that sexual minority youth report higher levels of sexual minority-specific victimization, depressive symptoms, and suicidality compared to their heterosexual peers [ 30 ]. Additionally, research has found that individuals from sexual and gender minority groups that perceive higher levels of stigma are more likely to report eating disorder symptoms [ 14 , 110 ], and that shame, concealment of one’s sexual identity, and discrimination increases the risk of eating disorders in sexual minority men and women [ 12 , 163 , 166 ]. Finally, minority stress is related to binge-eating in lesbian and bisexual women [ 106 ] and body dissatisfaction in gay males [ 94 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13, 14] Accordingly, researchers such as Bayer et al (2017), Wang and Borders (2016), and Watson et al (2016) examined how shame, concealing ones sexual orientation, and experiencing discrimination can elevate eating disorder risk among both sexual minority men and women. [1517] An in-depth review of the findings of studies that formally applied and tested theories and mechanisms underlying sexual orientation disparities is beyond the scope of this review, but a summary of the papers culled during the review is provided in Table 1.…”
Section: Theoretical Models For Sexual Orientation Disparitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%